Science teachers can teach computational thinking through distributed expertise

被引:11
作者
Tucker-Raymond, Eli [1 ]
Cassidy, Michael [2 ]
Puttick, Gillian [2 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Earl Ctr Learning & Innovat, 55 Pilgrim Rd, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] TERC, 2067 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Distributed learning environments; Teaching; learning strategies; Elementary education; Pedagogical issues; Applications in subject areas; MATHEMATICS; IMPLEMENTATION; EXPERIENCE; SCRATCH; SPACES; GOALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104284
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Content area K-12 teachers are increasingly asked to integrate computing and computational thinking into their classrooms, yet they often have little experience with computing. The purpose of this study was to understand how science teachers, new to computing and integrating computational thinking into their classrooms, supported students as computational problem solvers. In the project from which this research was drawn, 8th grade science teachers in three US school districts integrated computer game design into their study of climate systems and climate change. We conducted participant observation, collected teacher implementation logs and interviewed 15 teachers engaged in the three-year design research project, Building Systems from Scratch. Analysis through grounded theory yielded several results related to teachers' orientations, strategies, and use of resources to create systems of distributed expertise. We identified five major themes: a) releasing responsibility to students, b) co-learning with students, c) encouraging students' independent problem solving, d) building interdependence among students, and e) providing multiple other resources. Findings are discussed in relation to the literature on integrating computational thinking into content area classrooms.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 92 条
[21]  
Cole M., 1996, CULTURAL PSYCHOL ONC
[22]   GROUNDED THEORY RESEARCH - PROCEDURES, CANONS AND EVALUATIVE CRITERIA [J].
CORBIN, J ;
STRAUSS, A .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE, 1990, 19 (06) :418-427
[23]  
Curzon P., 2014, P 9 WORKSH PRIM SEC, V89
[24]   Remixing as a Pathway to Computational Thinking [J].
Dasgupta, Sayamindu ;
Halet, William ;
Monroy-Hernandez, Andres ;
Hill, Benjamin Mako .
ACM CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK AND SOCIAL COMPUTING (CSCW 2016), 2016, :1438-1449
[25]   If design-based research is the answer, what is the question?: A commentary on Collins, Joseph, and Bielaczyc;: diSessa and Cobb;: and Fishman, Marx, Blumenthal, Krajcik, and Soloway in the JLS special issue on design-based research [J].
Dede, C .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2004, 13 (01) :105-114
[26]   Viewpoint Remaining Trouble Spots with Computational Thinking [J].
Denning, Peter J. .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2017, 60 (06) :33-39
[27]   Sharing solutions: Persistence and grounding in multimodal collaborative problem solving [J].
Dillenbourg, P ;
Traum, D .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2006, 15 (01) :121-151
[28]   Infusing Computing: Analyzing Teacher Programming Products in K-12 Computational Thinking Professional Development [J].
Dong, Yihuan ;
Catete, Veronica ;
Lytle, Nicholas ;
Isvik, Amy ;
Barnes, Tiffany ;
Jocius, Robin ;
Albert, Jennifer ;
Joshi, Deepti ;
Robinson, Richard ;
Andrews, Ashley .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 ACM CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY IN COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION (ITICSE '19), 2019, :278-284
[29]   Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields [J].
Elliott, R ;
Fischer, CT ;
Rennie, DL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 38 :215-229
[30]   Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness [J].
Elo, Satu ;
Kaariainen, Maria ;
Kanste, Outi ;
Polkki, Tarja ;
Utriainen, Kati ;
Kyngas, Helvi .
SAGE OPEN, 2014, 4 (01)