Simulation-based assessment of supply chain resilience with consideration of recovery strategies in the COVID-19 pandemic context

被引:88
作者
Moosavi, Javid [1 ]
Hosseini, Seyedmohsen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Built Environm, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Southern Mississippi, Ind Engn Technol, Long Beach, MS 39560 USA
关键词
Supply chain resilience; Supply chain disruption; Supply chain risk management; Simulation; COVID-19; ORDER ALLOCATION; DISRUPTION; SYSTEMS; DEMAND; RISK; MITIGATION; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; POLICIES; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2021.107593
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, many firms lacked a strategy to cope with disruptions and maintain resiliency. In this study, we develop a measurement method to evaluate the impact of resilience strategies in a multi-stage supply chain (SC) in the presence of a pandemic. For the first time, we propose a method to deduce quantitative resilience assessment from simulation. We implement two resilience strategies, i.e., prepositioning extra-inventory and a backup supplier, and then we simulate its impact on SC resilience and financial performance. The simulation results indicate that the extra inventory leads to a higher resilience than a backup supplier but costs more for the given contextual setting. Finally, we examine the demand fulfillment and observe that the extra-inventory strategy allows for a higher service level, confirming our resilience simulations. We discuss the managerial implications of these findings on the descriptive and predictive analysis levels. Decision-makers can utilize our model and findings to develop a response plan in the occurrence of a pandemic or any long-duration high magnitude disruption. Also, scholars and managers can use our proposed method to measure SC resiliency from simulation in any disruption.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [1] Adams S, 2019, ANN ONCOL, V30, P405, DOI [10.1093/annonc/mdy518, 10.1093/annonc/mdy517]
  • [2] Aldrighetti R., 2019, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, V20, P81, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S40171-019-00223-8, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-019-00223-8]
  • [3] AnyLogistix, 2020, ANYLOGISTIX SUPPL CH
  • [4] Atan Z, 2012, SUPPLY CHAIN DISRUPTIONS: THEORY AND PRACTICE OF MANAGING RISK, P115, DOI 10.1007/978-0-85729-778-5_5
  • [5] Optimization of (s, S) inventory systems with random lead times and a service level constraint
    Bashyam, S
    Fu, MC
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1998, 44 (12) : S243 - S256
  • [6] On metrics for supply chain resilience
    Behzadi, Golnar
    O'Sullivan, Michael Justin
    Olsen, Tava Lennon
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 287 (01) : 145 - 158
  • [7] Dynamic impact on global supply chains performance of disruptions propagation produced by terrorist acts
    Bueno-Solano, Alfredo
    Gaston Cedillo-Campos, Miguel
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2014, 61 : 1 - 12
  • [8] Improving supply chain performance management: A systematic approach to analyzing iterative KPI accomplishment
    Cai, Jian
    Liu, Xiangdong
    Xiao, Zhihui
    Liu, Jin
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2009, 46 (02) : 512 - 521
  • [9] THE VARIABILITY OF AGGREGATE DEMAND WITH (S, S) INVENTORY POLICIES
    CAPLIN, AS
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1985, 53 (06) : 1395 - 1409
  • [10] Supply chain redesign for resilience using simulation
    Carvalho, Helena
    Barroso, Ana P.
    Machado, Virginia H.
    Azevedo, Susana
    Cruz-Machado, V.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 62 (01) : 329 - 341