Peanut oral immunotherapy in a pediatric allergy clinic: Patient factors associated with clinical outcomes

被引:5
|
作者
Guarnieri, Katharine M. [1 ,2 ]
Slack, Ian F. [1 ,2 ]
Gadoury-Levesque, Vanessa [3 ]
Eapen, Amy A. [4 ]
Andorf, Sandra [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Lierl, Michelle B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Allergy & Immunol, MLC 7028,3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] McGill Univ, Montreal Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Div Allergy & Clin Immunol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Div Allergy & Clin Immunol, Dept Med, Detroit, MI USA
[5] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Biomed Informat, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
关键词
DOUBLE-BLIND; EFFICACY; CHILDREN; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.anai.2021.04.003
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Additional information is needed to inform optimal patient selection, expected outcomes, and treatment end points for clinical peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT). Objective: To provide insight into the optimal patient selection, expected outcomes, and treatment end points for clinical peanut oral immunotherapy by analyzing a real-world peanut OIT cohort. Methods: Records were reviewed for 174 children undergoing peanut OIT at a pediatric allergy clinic. Patient age, peanut skin prick test results, and peanut-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) results, with inclusion of additional foods in OIT, were analyzed for correlations with OIT outcomes. Results: To date, 144 patients have achieved maintenance dosing, 50 of whom transitioned to ad lib twice weekly peanut ingestion. A total of 30 discontinued OIT. In addition, 47 patients who underwent multifood OIT had no significant difference in reactions (FDR-adjusted P = .48) or time-to-reach maintenance (FDR-adjusted P = .48) compared with those on peanut OIT alone. Age at initiation inversely correlated with achievement of maintenance: 92% of patients 0.5 to less than 5 years, 81% of those 5 to less than 11 years, and 70% of those 11 to less than 18 years reached and continued maintenance (P = .01). Baseline peanut-sIgE level positively correlated with number of reactions during updosing (P < .001) and maintenance (P = .005), though it was not significantly different in patients achieving successful maintenance vs those who discontinued OIT (P = .09). Furthermore, 66% of patients experienced greater than or equal to 1 adverse reaction during OIT. Of those on ad lib peanut ingestion, 2 reported mild reactions after lapses in peanut consumption. Conclusion: Clinical peanut OIT has similar outcomes to research protocols. OIT can be successful in older children and those with high peanut-sIgE levels, though these factors affect outcomes. Clinical and laboratory criteria can guide successful transition to intermittent ad lib peanut consumption. (c) 2021 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:214 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Peanut allergy and oral immunotherapy
    Lee, T. H.
    Chan, June K. C.
    Lau, P. C.
    Luk, W. P.
    Fung, L. H.
    HONG KONG MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (03) : 228 - 234
  • [2] Oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy: The con argument
    Fiocchi, Alessandro
    Artesani, Maria Cristina
    Fierro, Vincenzo
    Riccardi, Carla
    Dahdah, Lamia
    Mennini, Maurizio
    WORLD ALLERGY ORGANIZATION JOURNAL, 2020, 13 (08):
  • [3] Oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy: The pro argument
    Chinthrajah, R. Sharon
    Cao, Shu
    Dunham, Theresa
    Sampath, Vanitha
    Chandra, Sharad
    Chen, Meng
    Sindher, Sayantani
    Nadeau, Kari
    WORLD ALLERGY ORGANIZATION JOURNAL, 2020, 13 (08):
  • [4] Transitioning peanut oral immunotherapy to clinical practice
    Lazizi, S.
    Labrosse, R.
    Graham, F.
    FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY, 2022, 3
  • [5] AR101 Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy
    Vickery, Brian P.
    Vereda, Andrea
    Casale, Thomas B.
    Beyer, Kirsten
    du Toit, George
    Hourihane, Jonathan O.
    Jones, Stacie M.
    Shreffler, Wayne G.
    Marcantonio, Annette
    Zawadzki, Rezi
    Sher, Lawrence
    Carr, Warner W.
    Fineman, Stanley
    Greos, Leon
    Rachid, Rima
    Ibanez, M. Dolores
    Tilles, Stephen
    Assa'ad, Amal H.
    Nilsson, Caroline
    Rupp, Ned
    Welch, Michael J.
    Sussman, Gordon
    Chinthrajah, Sharon
    Blumchen, Katharina
    Sher, Ellen
    Spergel, Jonathan M.
    Leickly, Frederick E.
    Zielen, Stefan
    Wang, Julie
    Sanders, Georgiana M.
    Wood, Robert A.
    Cheema, Amarjit
    Bindslev-Jensen, Carsten
    Leonard, Stephanie
    Kachru, Rita
    Johnston, Douglas T.
    Hampel, Frank C., Jr.
    Kim, Edwin H.
    Anagnostou, Aikaterini
    Pongracic, Jacqueline A.
    Ben-Shoshan, Moshe
    Sharma, Hemant P.
    Stillerman, Allan
    Windom, Hugh H.
    Yang, William H.
    Muraro, Antonella
    Zubeldia, Jose M.
    Sharma, Vibha
    Dorsey, Morna J.
    Chong, Hey J.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 379 (21): : 1991 - 2001
  • [6] Oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy in clinical practice is ready
    Mansfield, Lyndon E.
    ALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS, 2013, 34 (03) : 205 - 209
  • [7] Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy
    Anagnostou, Katherine
    Clark, Andrew
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF MEDICINE, VOL 67, 2016, 67 : 375 - 385
  • [8] Onset of eosinophilic esophagitis during a clinical trial program of oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy
    Nilsson, Caroline
    Scurlock, Amy M.
    Dellon, Evan S.
    Brostoff, Joshua M.
    Pham, Trinh
    Ryan, Robert
    Brown, Kari R.
    Adelman, Daniel C.
    Aceves, Seema S.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2021, 9 (12): : 4496 - 4501
  • [9] Oral immunotherapy for multiple foods in a pediatric allergy clinic setting
    Eapen, Amy A.
    Lavery, William J.
    Siddiqui, Jaweriah S.
    Lierl, Michelle B.
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2019, 123 (06) : 573 - +
  • [10] Peanut Oral Immunotherapy: Is It Ready for Clinical Practice?
    Sampson, Hugh A.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2013, 1 (01): : 15 - 21