Human-robot collaboration disassembly planning for end-of-life product disassembly process

被引:58
作者
Parsa, Soran [1 ]
Saadat, Mozafar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Human-robot collaboration; Disassembly process; Sequence planning; Intelligent optimisation; End-of-life product; GENETIC ALGORITHM; SEQUENCE; EQUIPMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102170
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The disassembly process is the main step of dealing with End-Of-Life (EOL) products. This process is carried out mostly manually so far. Manual disassembly is not efficient economically and the robotic systems are not reliable in dealing with complex disassembly operations as they have high-level uncertainty. In this research, a disassembly planning method based on human-robot collaboration is proposed. This method employs the flexibility and ability of humans to deal with complex tasks, alongside the repeatability and accuracy of the robot. Besides, to increase the efficiency of the process the components are targeted based on the remanufacturability parameters. First, human-robot collaboration tasks are classified, and using evaluation of components remanufacturability parameters, human-robot collaboration definition and characteristics are defined. To target the right components based on their remanufacturability factors, the PROMETHEE II method is employed to select the components based on Cleanability, Reparability, and Economy. Then, the disassembly process is represented using AND/OR representation and the mathematical model of the process is defined. New optimization parameters for human-robot collaboration are defined and the genetic algorithm was modified to find a nearoptimal solution based on the defined parameters. To validate the task classification and allocation, a 6-DOF TECHMAN robot arm is used to test the peg-out-hole disassembly operation as a common disassembly task. The experiments confirm the task classification and allocation method. Finally, an automotive component was selected as a case study to validate the efficiency of the proposed method. The results in comparison with the Particle Swarm algorithm prove the efficiency and reliability of the method. This method produces a higher quality solution for the human-robot collaborative disassembly process.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Abdullah Lazim, 2019, Journal of Industrial Engineering International, V15, P271, DOI 10.1007/s40092-018-0289-z
  • [2] A Robust Robotic Disassembly Sequence Design Using Orthogonal Arrays and Task Allocation
    Alshibli, Mohammad
    Elsayed, Ahmed
    Kongar, Elif
    Sobh, Tarek
    Gupta, Surendra M.
    [J]. ROBOTICS, 2019, 8 (01):
  • [3] Avikal S, 2013, IND ENG MANAG SYST, V12, P254
  • [4] Bourjault A., 1984, Contribution to a Methodological Approach of Automated Assembly: Automatic Generation of Assembly Sequence
  • [5] Dynamic task classification and assignment for the management of human-robot collaborative teams in workcells
    Bruno, Giulia
    Antonelli, Dario
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 98 (9-12) : 2415 - 2427
  • [6] Collaborative manufacturing with physical human-robot interaction
    Cherubini, Andrea
    Passama, Robin
    Crosnier, Andre
    Lasnier, Antoine
    Fraisse, Philippe
    [J]. ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2016, 40 : 1 - 13
  • [7] Evolutionary sequence planning for selective disassembly in de-manufacturing
    Chung, C
    Peng, Q
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2006, 19 (03) : 278 - 286
  • [8] Robotic disassembly line balancing problem: A mathematical model and ant colony optimization approach
    Cil, Zeynel Abidin
    Mete, Suleyman
    Serin, Faruk
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2020, 86 : 335 - 348
  • [9] Efficiency and feasibility of product disassembly: A case-based study
    Duflou, J. R.
    Seliger, G.
    Kara, S.
    Umeda, Y.
    Ometto, A.
    Willems, B.
    [J]. CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 57 (02) : 583 - 600