Socio-economic Impact of a Solar Water Pumping System in a Rural Community in Indonesia

被引:5
作者
Rahmani, Sita [1 ]
Murayama, Takehiko [1 ]
Nishikizawa, Shigeo [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Inst Technol, Dept Transdisciplinary Sci & Engn, Midori Ku, Bldg G5-9,4259 Nagatsuta, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2268502, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY WATER AND ENVIRONMENT SYSTEMS-JSDEWES | 2022年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
Socio-economic impacts; Community renewable energy; Solar water pumping system; Indonesia; Rural communities; RENEWABLE ENERGY;
D O I
10.13044/j.sdewes.d9.0403
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Decentralized renewable energy projects, such as solar photovoltaic water pumping, have been deployed to provide access to water in rural areas with strong involvement of the local community. However, the ways in which communities benefit from such projects has been insufficiently studied, and the establishment process has been better documented. Moreover, relevant studies from developing countries are limited. This study was conducted to provide empirical evidence of the local impacts of community-scale renewable energy projects in a developing country, using the case of solar water pumping in Indonesia. A questionnaire survey was used to evaluate the socio-economic impacts perceived by the beneficiaries, and, subsequently, qualitative and statistical analysis were conducted. The results showed that the capacity of the local management team and satisfaction in saving money were perceived as the most significant impacts. However, the economic benefit of financial savings did not translate to welfare improvement. These findings provide insights that shows that (1) members of rural communities gained knowledge regarding the renewable energy technology through project deployment and ( 2) creating a support mechanism along with project deployment is crucial to achieve greater development opportunities in the context of rural poverty alleviation.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [31] STAKEHOLDING - NOTES ON A THEORY OF WELFARE BASED ON ASSETS
    SHERRADEN, M
    [J]. SOCIAL SERVICE REVIEW, 1990, 64 (04) : 580 - 601
  • [32] Harvesting energy: Place and local entrepreneurship in community-based renewable energy transition
    Suesser, Diana
    Doering, Martin
    Ratter, Beate M. W.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 101 : 332 - 341
  • [33] UNESCAP, 2012, LOW CARB GREEN GROWT
  • [34] Utami F. R. C., 2014, T COMMUNITY TECHNOLO
  • [35] Vanclay FrankAna Maria Esteves., 2015, Social Impact Assessment: Guidance for Assessing and Managing the Social Impacts of Projects
  • [36] Integrated Communities for the Sustainability of Renewable Energy Application: Solar Water Pumping System in Banyumeneng Village, Indonesia
    Wahyuni, Nur Setyo
    Wulandari, Suci
    Wulandari, Ellena
    Pamuji, Didit Setyo
    [J]. 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2015, 79 : 1027 - 1032
  • [37] Community renewable energy: What should it mean?
    Walker, Gordon
    Devine-Wright, Patrick
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (02) : 497 - 500
  • [38] Trust and community: Exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy
    Walker, Gordon
    Devine-Wright, Patrick
    Hunter, Sue
    High, Helen
    Evans, Bob
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (06) : 2655 - 2663
  • [39] A review of sustainable solar irrigation systems for Sub-Saharan Africa
    Wazed, Saeed Mohammed
    Hughes, Ben Richard
    O'Connor, Dominic
    Calautit, John Kaiser
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 81 : 1206 - 1225
  • [40] White Howard, 2018, 30 INT IN IMP EV