Design for the new San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge East Span, soil-structure interaction problems

被引:0
作者
Lam, IP [1 ]
Law, H [1 ]
Kapuskar, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Earth Mech Inc, Fountain Valley, CA 92708 USA
来源
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS, VOL 1 | 2004年 / 126期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper presents a brief summary of two aspects of soil-structure interaction studies conducted for the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge East Span project. There was significant variability in the presence or absence of a very dense Merritt sand layer at shallow depths due to Paleochannel erosions of the Merritt sand strata. This resulted in the choice of battered pile groups for the skyway. A battered pile group has some advantages for the specific project condition. The SFOBB skyway contract is unique in the fact that the resultant design needs to be checked against both conventional response spectrum solution as well as time history solutions. A rigorous kinematic soil structure interaction (SSI) input motion approach was adopted in developing the theoretically rational acceleration response spectrum (ARS) criteria. This paper provides discussions of the kinematic SSI motion approach. Various site stability issues have surfaced historically at the Oakland Mole approach, due to the combination of poor soil condition and the relatively steep ground relief features at that location. Efforts were involved in the design to address potential ground movements and their implication to the Oakland Mole transition structures. The pinning effect of the large pile groups was found to be significant in stabilizing the ground against potential ground movements. This aspect is also addressed in this paper.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 304
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Seismic Design of the San Francisco - Oakland Bay Bridge Self Anchored Suspension Bridge [J].
Nader, M. ;
Tang, M. -C. ;
Maroney, B. .
BRIDGE MAINTENANCE, SAFETY, MANAGEMENT, RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, :1999-2007
[42]   Impact of Peak and Off-Peak Tolls on Traffic in San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge Corridor in California [J].
Barnes, Ian C. ;
Frick, Karen Trapenberg ;
Deakin, Elizabeth ;
Skabardonis, Alexander .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2012, (2297) :73-79
[43]   Young Consultants Award: Successful Transportation Management Planning for the Unprecedented Full Closure of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge [J].
Ng, Joanne C. W. .
ITE JOURNAL-INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS, 2008, 78 (11) :38-43
[44]   Experimental evaluation of compressive behavior of orthotropic steel plates for the new San Francisco Oakland Bay Bridge [J].
Chou, C. C. ;
Uang, C. M. ;
Seible, F. .
JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2006, 11 (02) :140-150
[45]   DYNAMIC SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION OF A SINGLE-SPAN BRIDGE. [J].
Crouse, C.B. ;
Hushmand, B. ;
Martin, G.R. .
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1987, l5 (06)
[46]   Modelling of soil-structure interaction for seismic analyses of the lzmit Bay Bridge [J].
Lyngs, J. H. ;
Kasper, T. ;
Bertelsen, K. S. .
CHALLENGES AND INNOVATIONS IN GEOTECHNICS: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOIL MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, VOL 1, 2013, :763-768
[47]   Soil-structure interaction for the seismic design of the Messina Strait Bridge [J].
Callisto, Luigi ;
Rampello, Sebastiano ;
Viggiani, Giulia M. B. .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2013, 52 :103-115
[48]   Seismic soil-structure interaction in multi-span bridges: Application to a railway bridge [J].
Carbonari, Sandro ;
Dezi, Francesca ;
Leoni, Graziano .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2011, 40 (11) :1219-1239
[49]   THE INFLUENCE OF SOIL-STRUCTURE DYNAMIC INTERACTION TO THE SEISMIC DESIGN OF INTEGRAL BRIDGE [J].
Song, Bo ;
Zhang, Xiao .
RECENT DEVELOPMENT OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEO-ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING IN ASIA, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, :441-446
[50]   Dynamic soil-structure interaction of a single-span railway bridge, forced vibration testing and simulation [J].
Albright, Ann ;
Battini, Jean-Marc ;
Andersson, Andreas .
STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2025, 21 (01) :39-48