Numerical Simulation-Based Investigation of the Limits of Different Quasistatic Models

被引:3
作者
Taha, Houssein [1 ]
Tang, Zuqi [1 ]
Henneron, Thomas [1 ]
Le Menach, Yvonnick [1 ]
Salomez, Florentin [1 ]
Ducreux, Jean-Pierre [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lille, Arts & Metiers Inst Technol, ULR2697 L2EP, Cent Lille, F-59000 Lille, France
[2] ERMES, EDF R&D, 7 Blvd Gaspard Monge, F-91120 Palaiseau, France
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 23期
关键词
electromagnetic; finite-element method; quasistatic models; resistive; capacitive; inductive effects; MAXWELL FORMULATION;
D O I
10.3390/app112311218
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The modeling of the capacitive phenomena, including the inductive effects becomes critical, especially in the case of a power converter with high switching frequencies, supplying an electrical device. At a low frequency, the electro-quasistatic (EQS) model is widely used to study the coupled resistive-capacitive effects, while the magneto-quasistatic (MQS) model is used to describe the coupled resistive-inductive effects. When the frequency increases, the Darwin model is preferred, which is able to capture the coupled resistive-capacitive-inductive effects by neglecting the radiation effects. In this work, we are interested in specifying the limits of these models, by investigating the influence of the frequency on the electromagnetic field distributions and the impedance of electromagnetic devices. Two different examples are carried out. For the first one, to validate the Darwin model, the measurement results are provided for comparison with the simulation results, which shows a good agreement. For the second one, the simulation results from three different models are compared, for both the local field distributions and the global impedances. It is shown that the EQS model can be used as an indicator to know at which frequency the Darwin model should be applied.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   MAGNETOSTATIC FIELD COMPUTATIONS IN TERMS OF 2-COMPONENT VECTOR POTENTIALS [J].
ALBANESE, R ;
RUBINACCI, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 1990, 29 (03) :515-532
[2]   Full Wave Potential Formulation With Low-Frequency Stability Including Ohmic Losses [J].
Badics, Zsolt ;
Pavo, Jozsef .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2015, 51 (03)
[3]   Hierarchical Matrix Preconditioning for Low-Frequency-Full-Maxwell Simulations [J].
Bebendorf, Mario ;
Kraemer, Florian .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2013, 101 (02) :423-433
[4]  
Clements MP, 2019, PALGR TEXTS ECONOMET, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-97223-7
[5]  
Cortes Garcia I., 2018, APPL DIFFERENTIAL AL, P123, DOI DOI 10.1007/11221_2018_8
[6]   A SYMMETRIC LOW-FREQUENCY STABLE BROADBAND MAXWELL FORMULATION FOR INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS [J].
Eller, Martin ;
Reitzinger, Stefan ;
Schoeps, Sebastian ;
Zaglmayr, Sabine .
SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2017, 39 (04) :B703-B731
[7]  
Haus H., 1989, J ELECTROMAGNETIC FI
[8]   A robust Maxwell formulation for all frequencies [J].
Hiptmair, Ralf ;
Kraemer, Florian ;
Ostrowski, Jorg .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2008, 44 (06) :682-685
[9]   Different types of quasistationary formulations for time domain simulations [J].
Koch, S. ;
Weiland, T. .
RADIO SCIENCE, 2011, 46
[10]   A Low-Frequency Approximation to the Maxwell Equations Simultaneously Considering Inductive and Capacitive Phenomena [J].
Koch, Stephan ;
Schneider, Hermann ;
Weiland, Thomas .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2012, 48 (02) :511-514