Response analysis and optimization of the air spring with epistemic uncertainties

被引:3
|
作者
Kong, Feng [1 ,2 ]
Bai, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Liang, Xifeng [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Zhaijun [1 ,2 ]
Yin, Shengwen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Traff & Transportat Engn, Dept Transportat Equipment & Control Engn, Changsha 410075, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Educ, Key Lab Traff Safety Track, Changsha, Peoples R China
关键词
evidence theory; arbitrary orthogonal polynomial; sparse grid quadrature; optimization; air spring; EXPANSION APPROACH; SYSTEMS; QUANTIFICATION; PREDICTION; MODEL; FIELD;
D O I
10.1515/rams-2022-0008
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Traditional methods for the optimization design of the air spring are based on the deterministic assumption that the parameters are fixed. However, uncertainties widely exist during the manufacturing stage of the air spring. To model the uncertainties in air springs, evidence theory is introduced. For the response analysis of the air spring system under evidence theory, an evidence theory-based polynomial chaos method, called the sparse grid quadrature-based arbitrary orthogonal polynomial (SGQ-AOP) method, is proposed. In the SGQ-AOP method, the response of the air spring is approximated by AOP expansion, and the sparse grid quadrature is introduced to calculate the expansion coefficient. For optimization of the air spring, a reliability-based optimization model is established under evidence theory. To improve the efficiency of optimization, the SGQ-AOP method is used to establish the surrogate model for the response of the air spring. The proposed response analysis and the optimization method were employed to optimize an air spring with epistemic uncertainties, and its effectiveness has been demonstrated by comparing it with the traditional evidence theory-based AOP method.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 89
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A BEPU ANALYSIS SEPARATING EPISTEMIC AND ALEATORY ERRORS TO COMPUTE ACCURATE DRYOUT POWER UNCERTAINTIES
    Pun-Quach, D.
    Sermer, P.
    Hoppe, F. M.
    Nainer, O.
    Phan, B.
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 181 (01) : 170 - 183
  • [42] Multistep Analysis of the Mechanical Performance of an Air Spring
    Li Fengxiang
    Ding Yumei
    Yan Hua
    Guan Changfeng
    Yang Weimin
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, 2009, 111 (02) : 1005 - 1012
  • [43] Evidence-Theory-Based Analysis for Structural-Acoustic Field with Epistemic Uncertainties
    Xie, Longxiang
    Liu, Jian
    Zhang, Jinan
    Man, Xianfeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS, 2017, 14 (02)
  • [44] Consideration and Propagation of Epistemic Uncertainties in New Zealand Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Analysis
    Bradley, Brendon A.
    Stirling, Mark W.
    McVerry, Graeme H.
    Gerstenberger, Matt
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2012, 102 (04) : 1554 - 1568
  • [45] Dynamic analysis of geared transmission system for wind turbines with mixed aleatory and epistemic uncertainties
    Fu, Chao
    Lu, Kuan
    Xu, Y. D.
    Yang, Yongfeng
    Gu, F. S.
    Chen, Yushu
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND MECHANICS-ENGLISH EDITION, 2022, 43 (02) : 275 - 294
  • [46] Combined active learning Kriging with optimal saturation nonlinear vibration control for uncertain systems with both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties
    Liu, Xiao-Xiao
    Bai, Ling-Wei
    Ren, Xing-Min
    He, Bing-Bing
    Elishakoff, Isaac
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NON-LINEAR MECHANICS, 2023, 148
  • [47] Handling epistemic uncertainties in PRA using evidential networks
    王冬
    陈进
    程志君
    郭波
    Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21 (11) : 4261 - 4269
  • [48] Incorporating aleatory and epistemic uncertainties in the modelling of construction duration
    Ahmadu, Hassan Adaviriku
    Ibrahim, Ahmed Doko
    Ibrahim, Yahaya Makarfi
    Adogbo, Kulomri Jipato
    ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 27 (09) : 2199 - 2219
  • [49] Handling epistemic uncertainties in PRA using evidential networks
    Dong Wang
    Jin Chen
    Zhi-jun Cheng
    Bo Guo
    Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21 : 4261 - 4269
  • [50] Quantification of margins and uncertainties: Alternative representations of epistemic uncertainty
    Helton, Jon C.
    Johnson, Jay D.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2011, 96 (09) : 1034 - 1052