Response analysis and optimization of the air spring with epistemic uncertainties

被引:3
|
作者
Kong, Feng [1 ,2 ]
Bai, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Liang, Xifeng [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Zhaijun [1 ,2 ]
Yin, Shengwen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Traff & Transportat Engn, Dept Transportat Equipment & Control Engn, Changsha 410075, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Educ, Key Lab Traff Safety Track, Changsha, Peoples R China
关键词
evidence theory; arbitrary orthogonal polynomial; sparse grid quadrature; optimization; air spring; EXPANSION APPROACH; SYSTEMS; QUANTIFICATION; PREDICTION; MODEL; FIELD;
D O I
10.1515/rams-2022-0008
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Traditional methods for the optimization design of the air spring are based on the deterministic assumption that the parameters are fixed. However, uncertainties widely exist during the manufacturing stage of the air spring. To model the uncertainties in air springs, evidence theory is introduced. For the response analysis of the air spring system under evidence theory, an evidence theory-based polynomial chaos method, called the sparse grid quadrature-based arbitrary orthogonal polynomial (SGQ-AOP) method, is proposed. In the SGQ-AOP method, the response of the air spring is approximated by AOP expansion, and the sparse grid quadrature is introduced to calculate the expansion coefficient. For optimization of the air spring, a reliability-based optimization model is established under evidence theory. To improve the efficiency of optimization, the SGQ-AOP method is used to establish the surrogate model for the response of the air spring. The proposed response analysis and the optimization method were employed to optimize an air spring with epistemic uncertainties, and its effectiveness has been demonstrated by comparing it with the traditional evidence theory-based AOP method.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 89
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A sequential simulation strategy for response bounds analysis of structures with interval uncertainties
    Ni, B. Y.
    Jiang, C.
    Wu, P. G.
    Wang, Z. H.
    Tian, W. Y.
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2022, 265
  • [22] Handling epistemic uncertainties in PRA using evidential networks
    Wang Dong
    Chen Jin
    Cheng Zhi-jun
    Guo Bo
    JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY, 2014, 21 (11) : 4261 - 4269
  • [23] Dynamic characteristic analysis and key parameter optimization of throttling orifice type air damping air spring
    Chen, Junjie
    Huang, Ziqi
    Kang, Sheng
    Yang, Qin
    Yuan, Xianju
    Huang, Peng
    Gan, Yu Feng
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 35 (10)
  • [24] A unified method and its application to brake instability analysis involving different types of epistemic uncertainties
    Lu, Hui
    Shangguan, Wen-Bin
    Yu, Dejie
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2018, 56 : 158 - 171
  • [25] A Decoupling Strategy for Reliability Analysis of Multidisciplinary System with Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainties
    Fu, Chao
    Liu, Jihong
    Xu, Wenting
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (15):
  • [26] Mapping epistemic uncertainties and vague concepts in predictions of species distribution
    Elith, J
    Burgman, MA
    Regan, HM
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2002, 157 (2-3) : 313 - 329
  • [27] Uncertainty Analysis of Flood Control Measures Including Epistemic and Aleatory Uncertainties: Probability Theory and Evidence Theory
    Behrouz, Masoume
    Alimohammadi, Saeed
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2018, 23 (08)
  • [28] Development and analysis of an air spring model
    Lee, S. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 11 (04) : 471 - 479
  • [29] A new chance reliability-based design optimization approach considering aleatory and epistemic uncertainties
    Zhou, Shuang
    Zhang, Jianguo
    Zhang, Qingyuan
    Wen, Meilin
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2022, 65 (08)
  • [30] Development and analysis of an air spring model
    S. J. Lee
    International Journal of Automotive Technology, 2010, 11 : 471 - 479