The Place of Community Forest Management in the REDD plus Landscape

被引:47
作者
Pelletier, Johanne [1 ]
Gelinas, Nancy [2 ]
Skutsch, Margaret [3 ]
机构
[1] Woods Hole Res Ctr, 149 Woods Hole Rd, Falmouth, MA 02540 USA
[2] Univ Laval, Dept Sci Bois & Foret, Fac Foresterie Geog & Geomat, 2405 Rue Terrasse Pavillon Abitibi Price, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
[3] UNAM, CIGA, Campus Morelia, Morelia 58190, Michoacan, Mexico
关键词
community forest management; reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD plus ); livelihoods; benefit sharing; POVERTY ALLEVIATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; TROPICAL FOREST; PROTECTED AREAS; LAND-USE; DEFORESTATION; CARBON; CONSERVATION; LIVELIHOODS; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.3390/f7080170
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Community forest management (CFM) is identified by many actors as a core strategy for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries (REDD+). Others however see REDD+ as a danger to CFM. In response to these contrasting views, we carried out a systematic review of CFM case studies to look at CFM's potential role in achieving forest carbon benefits and social co-benefits for forest communities. We evaluated the potential impacts of REDD+ on CFM. Our review showed that there is strong evidence of CFM's role in reducing degradation and stabilizing forested landscapes; however, the review also showed less evidence about the role of CFM in reducing deforestation. For social benefits, we found that CFM contributes to livelihoods, but its effect on poverty reduction may be limited. Also, CFM may not deal adequately with the distribution of benefits within communities or user groups. These insights are important for CFM-based REDD+ intervention; measures should be adopted to overcome these gaps. Innovative incentive structures to existing CFM are discussed. The recognition of rights for forest communities is one first step identified in promoting CFM. We call for sound empirical impact evaluations that analyze CFM and CFM-based REDD+ interventions by looking at both biophysical and social outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 121 条
[1]   Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Gibson, CC .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1999, 27 (04) :629-649
[2]  
Agrawal A., 2009, Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options, P201, DOI DOI 10.17528/CIFOR/002871
[3]   Changing governance of the world's forests [J].
Agrawal, Arun ;
Chhatre, Ashwini ;
Hardin, Rebecca .
SCIENCE, 2008, 320 (5882) :1460-1462
[4]   Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation [J].
Agrawal, Arun ;
Nepstad, Daniel ;
Chhatre, Ashwini .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 36, 2011, 36 :373-396
[5]   A tale of two communities: Explaining deforestation in Mexico [J].
Alix-Garcia, J ;
De Janvry, A ;
Sadoulet, E .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 33 (02) :219-235
[6]   Impacts of access and benefit sharing on livelihoods and forest: Case of participatory forest management in Ethiopia [J].
Ameha, Aklilu ;
Nielsen, Oystein Juul ;
Larsen, Helle Overgard .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 97 :162-171
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ECONOMIST
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2003, LOCAL FOREST MANAGEM
[9]  
[Anonymous], P C PART 21 SESS PAR
[10]   Are conservation strategies effective in avoiding the deforestation of the Colombian Guyana Shield? [J].
Armenteras, Dolors ;
Rodriguez, Nelly ;
Retana, Javier .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2009, 142 (07) :1411-1419