How persistent are the effects of experience sampling on investor behavior?

被引:11
作者
Bradbury, Meike A. S. [1 ]
Hens, Thorsten [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Zeisberger, Stefan [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Dept Banking & Finance, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Norwegian Sch Econ, Dept Finance, Bergen, Norway
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Management Res, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Lucerne, Dept Econ, Luzern, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Behavioral finance; Simulated experience; Experience sampling; Investment decision; Risk communication; Financial advice; Fintech; MYOPIC LOSS AVERSION; RISK-TAKING; PORTFOLIO CHOICE; CONSUMPTION; DISCLOSURE; ATTITUDES; GENDER; STOCK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.10.014
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Investor behavior was shown to be considerably different when the risk-return tradeoff is presented by experience sampling as opposed to a descriptive communication. We analyze the persistency of this difference in a setting in which investors are faced with multiple decisions over time and are consequently able to adjust the risk level they initially chose. For this we use an experimental setting with repeated investment decisions over multiple trading days, and we also test a new form of risk simulation in which wealth paths over time are presented rather than just final outcomes. After investors' initial decisions, for which we confirm previous findings, we do not find persistent differences of simulation-based learning on investors' risk-taking behavior. With regards to trading volume, only a simulation in which investors see wealth paths and not only final outcomes leads to lower trading frequency soon after the initial asset allocation. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 79
页数:19
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Agarwal Sumit., 2018, Age of decision: Pension savings withdrawal and consumption and debt response*
[2]   Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment [J].
Barber, BM ;
Odean, T .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2001, 116 (01) :261-292
[3]   A comprehensive comparison of students and non-students in classic experimental games [J].
Belot, Michele ;
Duch, Raymond ;
Miller, Luis .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2015, 113 :26-33
[4]   Risk aversion or myopia? Choices in repeated gambles and retirement investments [J].
Benartzi, S ;
Thaler, RH .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1999, 45 (03) :364-381
[5]   MYOPIC LOSS AVERSION AND THE EQUITY PREMIUM PUZZLE [J].
BENARTZI, S ;
THALER, RH .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 110 (01) :73-92
[6]   Portfolio choice over the life-cycle when the stock and labor markets are cointegrated [J].
Benzoni, Luca ;
Collin-Dufresne, Pierre ;
Goldstein, Robert S. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2007, 62 (05) :2123-2167
[7]   Does Aggregated Returns Disclosure Increase Portfolio Risk Taking? [J].
Beshears, John ;
Choi, James J. ;
Laibson, David ;
Madrian, Brigitte C. .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2017, 30 (06) :1971-2005
[8]   Improving Investment Decisions with Simulated Experience [J].
Bradbury, Meike A. S. ;
Hens, Thorsten ;
Zeisberger, Stefan .
REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2015, 19 (03) :1019-1052
[9]   Household finance [J].
Campbell, John Y. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2006, 61 (04) :1553-1604
[10]  
Cason TN, 2015, J ECON SCI ASSOC-JES, V1, P170, DOI 10.1007/s40881-015-0013-3