A Multisample Demonstration of Using the Prolific Platform for Repeated Assessment and Psychometric Substance Use Research

被引:49
作者
Stanton, Kasey [1 ]
Carpenter, Ryan W. [2 ]
Nance, Melissa [2 ]
Sturgeon, Taylor [3 ]
Andino, Mara Villalongo [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wyoming, Dept Psychol, 1000 E Univ Ave, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
[2] Univ Missouri St Louis, Dept Psychol Sci, St Louis, MO USA
[3] Virginia Tech, Dept Psychol, Blacksburg, VA USA
关键词
crowdsourcing; repeated measures designs; substance use; psychopathology; psychometrics; MECHANICAL TURK; ASSOCIATIONS; PERSONALITY; DISORDER; DEPENDABILITY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1037/pha0000545
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Prolific platform offers a potentially useful and efficient crowdsourcing option for repeated assessment substance use research, including for psychometric research requiring large samples. We present both (a) a series of practical recommendations for using Prolific and (b) data from multiple samples demonstrating Prolific's potential for efficiently collected repeated measures data. First, we present data from a 5-day daily diary protocol. We recruited a large sample (N = 321 at Day 1) screened for a history of self-identified mental health issues and weekly alcohol use. Participant adherence was good (82%) even without in-person contact. Alcohol use patterns conformed to theoretical expectations: Participants were more likely to drink on Fridays and Saturdays than other days, men drank more than women, and higher Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT; Saunders et al., 1993) scores were associated with an increased likelihood of use and more overall drinking on a given day. Second, we present data from 429 Prolific participants screened for a history of mental health issues who completed assessments 2 weeks apart with strong retention (N = 377; 88%). We compare these data with the data from undergraduates (N = 529) to demonstrate Prolific's utility for conducting psychometrically oriented substance use research. Internal consistency estimates for measures from the Prolific data matched or exceeded those from the undergraduate data. Furthermore, measure scores showed strong temporal stability, and factor structures (e.g., AUDIT item-level structures) conformed to theoretical expectations. Collectively, these findings indicate that Prolific can be used successfully for repeated measures data collection.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 443
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] An improved brief measure of cannabis misuse: The Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test-Revised (CUDIT-R)
    Adamson, Simon J.
    Kay-Lambkin, Frances J.
    Baker, Amanda L.
    Lewin, Terry J.
    Thornton, Louise
    Kelly, Brian J.
    Sellman, J. Douglas
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2010, 110 (1-2) : 137 - 143
  • [2] American Psychiatric Association, 2022, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, V5th ed., text rev., DOI [10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596]
  • [3] The Importance of Assessing Clinical Phenomena in Mechanical Turk Research
    Arditte, Kimberly A.
    Cek, Demet
    Shaw, Ashley M.
    Timpano, Kiara R.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2016, 28 (06) : 684 - 691
  • [4] Alterations in Reward and Emotional Processing Differentiate Among Adults With a History of Childhood Maltreatment: Implications for Substance Use Behaviors
    Bounoua, Nadia
    Church, Leah
    Sadeh, Naomi
    [J]. EMOTION, 2021, 21 (08) : 1625 - 1636
  • [5] Concurrent and Lagged Associations of Prescription Opioid Use With Pain and Negative Affect in the Daily Lives of Chronic Pain Patients
    Carpenter, Ryan W.
    Lane, Sean P.
    Bruehl, Stephen
    Trull, Timothy J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 87 (10) : 872 - 886
  • [6] Comparing the Dependability and Associations With Functioning of the DSM-5 Section III Trait Model of Personality Pathology and the DSM-5 Section II Personality Disorder Model
    Chmielewski, Michael
    Ruggero, Camilo J.
    Kotov, Roman
    Liu, Keke
    Krueger, Robert F.
    [J]. PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 8 (03) : 228 - 236
  • [7] Clark L.A., 1999, HDB PERSONALITY, P399
  • [8] Constructing Validity: New Developments in Creating Objective Measuring Instruments
    Clark, Lee Anna
    Watson, David
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2019, 31 (12) : 1412 - 1427
  • [9] A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably?
    Cranford, James A.
    Shrout, Patrick E.
    Iida, Masumi
    Rafaeli, Eshkol
    Yip, Tiffany
    Bolger, Niall
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2006, 32 (07) : 917 - 929