INSULIN LISPRO WITH CONTINUOUS SUBCUTANEOUS INSULIN INFUSION IS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES: A RANDOMIZED CROSSOVER TRIAL OF INSULIN LISPRO VERSUS INSULIN ASPART

被引:3
|
作者
Thrasher, James [1 ]
Bhargava, Anuj [2 ]
Rees, Tina M. [3 ]
Wang, Tao [3 ]
Guzman, Cristina B. [3 ]
Glass, Leonard C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Med Invest Inc, Little Rock, AR USA
[2] Iowa Diabet & Endocrinol Res Ctr, Des Moines, IA USA
[3] Eli Lilly & Co, Lilly Diabet, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
关键词
MULTIPLE DAILY INJECTIONS; PUMP THERAPY; PROTAMINE SUSPENSION; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; MELLITUS; DETEMIR; GLULISINE; EFFICACY; REGIMEN;
D O I
10.4158/EP14242.OR
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: This study provides clinical information regarding the use of insulin lispro versus insulin aspart in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). Methods: After a 2-week lead-in period, 122 subjects treated with CSII therapy were randomized to 32 weeks of treatment during 2 separate 16-week treatment periods(TPs) with crossover beginning with insulin lispro (n = 60) or insulin aspart (n = 62). Glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), total daily insulin dose, and weight were recorded at the end of TP1 and TP2. Adverse events (AEs) and hypoglycemic events (overall, documented symptomatic, nocturnal, or severe) were recorded throughout the TPs. Data were analyzed using statistical methods that accounted for repeated measurements. Results: A total of 107 subjects completed the study; 7 discontinued in TP1 and 8 discontinued in TP2. Insulin lispro was noninferior to insulin aspart in endpoint (weeks 16 and 32) HbA1c over TP1 and TP2 combined. Total daily insulin dose, weight change, and incidence and rates of hypoglycemia were not statistically significantly different between treatments. One case of severe hypoglycemia and 1 of diabetic ketoacidosis was observed with insulin aspart. One case of severe infusion site abscess was noted with insulin lispro. Overall, both insulin lispro and insulin aspart were well tolerated with similar AEs reported. Conclusion: Insulin lispro and insulin aspart performed similarly after 16 weeks of treatment, with non-inferiority for HbA1c and no significant difference in parameters measured. These findings indicate that insulin lispro and insulin aspart can both be used safely and effectively in patients with T2D using CSII.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 257
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Insulin Glulisine Compared to Insulin Aspart and to Insulin Lispro Administered by Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    van Bon, Arianne C.
    Bode, Bruce W.
    Sert-Langeron, Caroline
    DeVries, J. Hans
    Charpentier, Guillaume
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 13 (06) : 607 - 614
  • [2] BioChaperone Lispro versus faster aspart and insulin aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: A randomized euglycemic clamp study
    Heise, Tim
    Meiffren, Gregory
    Alluis, Bertrand
    Seroussi, Cyril
    Ranson, Aymeric
    Arrubla, Jorge
    Correia, Jose
    Gaudier, Martin
    Soula, Olivier
    Soula, Remi
    DeVries, J. Hans
    Klein, Oliver
    Bode, Bruce
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2019, 21 (04): : 1066 - 1070
  • [3] CONTINUOUS SUBCUTANEOUS INFUSION OF INSULIN LISPRO IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS WITH TYPE 1 DIABETES MELLITUS
    Kaiserman, Kevin
    Rodriguez, Henry
    Stephenson, Amanda
    Wolka, Linda
    Fahrbach, Jessie L.
    ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2012, 18 (03) : 418 - 424
  • [4] Insulin lispro 25/75 and insulin lispro 50/50 as starter insulin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: subanalysis of the CLASSIFY randomized trial
    Watada, Hirotaka
    Imori, Makoto
    Li, Pengfei
    Iwamoto, Noriyuki
    ENDOCRINE JOURNAL, 2017, 64 (07) : 705 - 717
  • [5] Pharmacological properties of faster-acting insulin aspart vs insulin aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes receiving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: A randomized, double-blind, crossover trial
    Heise, Tim
    Zijlstra, Eric
    Nosek, Leszek
    Rikte, Tord
    Haahr, Hanne
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2017, 19 (02): : 208 - 215
  • [6] Starting an insulin regimen with insulin lispro mix 25 versus glargine insulin for type 2 diabetes
    Fernandez Lando, Laura
    Massari, Fabio
    Oviedo, Alejandra
    Jiang, Honghua
    MEDICINA-BUENOS AIRES, 2012, 72 (03) : 235 - 242
  • [7] Initiation of Prandial Insulin Therapy with AIR Inhaled Insulin or Insulin Lispro in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial
    Gross, Jorge L.
    Nakano, Masako
    Colon-Vega, Gildred
    Ortiz-Carasquillo, Ramon
    Ferguson, Jeffrey A.
    Althouse, Sandra
    Tobian, Janet A.
    Berclaz, Pierre-Yves
    Milicevic, Zvonko
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 11 : S27 - S34
  • [8] Comparison of insulin lispro mix 25 with insulin lispro mix 50 as an insulin starter in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes: a phase 4, open-label, randomized trial (CLASSIFY study)
    Watada, Hirotaka
    Su, Qing
    Li, Peng Fei
    Iwamoto, Noriyuki
    Qian, Lei
    Yang, Wen Ying
    DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2017, 33 (01)
  • [9] Comparison of insulin lispro protamine suspension versus insulin glargine once daily in basal-bolus therapies with insulin lispro in type 2 diabetes patients: a prospective randomized open-label trial
    Koivisto, V.
    Cleall, S.
    Pontiroli, A. E.
    Giugliano, D.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2011, 13 (12): : 1149 - 1157
  • [10] Addition of insulin lispro protamine suspension or insulin glargine to oral type 2 diabetes regimens: a randomized trial
    Strojek, K.
    Shi, C.
    Carey, M. A.
    Jacober, S. J.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2010, 12 (10): : 916 - 922