Work status and work ability after radical prostatectomy or active surveillance for prostate cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Nilsson, Rasmus [1 ,2 ]
Dahl, Alv A. [2 ,3 ]
Bernklev, Tomm [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Kersten, Hege [6 ]
Haug, Erik S. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Telemark Hosp Trust, Dept Urol, POB 2900, N-3710 Skien, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Radiumhosp, Natl Advisory Unit Late Effects Canc Therapy, Oslo, Norway
[4] Vestfold Hosp Trust, Dept Res & Dev, Tonsberg, Norway
[5] Telemark Hosp Trust, Dept Res & Dev, Skien, Norway
[6] Univ Oslo, Sch Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Biosci, Oslo, Norway
[7] Vestfold Hosp Trust, Dept Urol, Tonsberg, Norway
[8] Oslo Univ Hosp, Inst Canc Genom & Informat, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Active surveillance; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; work status; work ability; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; NORWEGIAN POPULATION; SICK LEAVE; FATIGUE; SURVIVORS; HEALTH; RETURN; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; INSTRUMENT;
D O I
10.1080/21681805.2020.1750473
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Being able to work is important for health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and little is known about work life after radical treatment for prostate cancer (PCa). The aim was to investigate work status (WS) and work ability (WA) after radical prostatectomy (RP) or active surveillance (AS) for PCa, and to identify factors associated with reduced WA. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of 606 men treated with RP (n = 442) or AS (n = 164) at two Norwegian general hospitals. In 2017, they were asked to complete questionnaires measuring adverse effects (AE), HRQoL, aspects of work life and psychological factors at a median of 4.1 (range 1.3-8.1) years after diagnosis. Clinical data were retrieved from medical records. WS was categorized into employed, unemployed or retired. WA was rated using the Work Ability Index. Regression analyses were performed to find factors associated with reduced WA. Results: WS was similar for the RP and AS groups at diagnosis and survey. There was a small reduction in WA from diagnosis to survey and the difference between the RP and AS groups was non-significant. Older age, poorer self-rated health, poorer incontinence score, more chronic fatigue, and increased anxiety and depressive symptoms were associated with reduced WA, while treatment method, urinary bother and use of pads were not. Conclusion: The impact of RP and AS on WS and WA was almost similar. Age and psychological variables were more strongly associated with reduced WA than cancer-related variables.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 200
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Low-volume grade group 2 prostate cancer candidates for active surveillance: a radical prostatectomy retrospective analysis
    Bjorklund, Johan
    Cheung, Douglas C. C.
    Martin, Lisa J. J.
    Komisarenko, Maria
    Lajkosz, Katharine
    Hamilton, Robert J. J.
    Zlotta, Alexandre R. R.
    Finelli, Antonio
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 57 (1-6) : 29 - 35
  • [32] The cost-effectiveness of active surveillance compared to watchful waiting and radical prostatectomy for low risk localised prostate cancer
    Lao, Chunhuan
    Edlin, Richard
    Rouse, Paul
    Brown, Charis
    Holmes, Michael
    Gilling, Peter
    Lawrenson, Ross
    BMC CANCER, 2017, 17
  • [33] Comparison of quality of life after radical treatment in prostate cancer: radical prostatectomy versus external radiotherapy
    Vera-Alamo, Laura
    Leon-Medina, Paula
    Hernandez-Flores, Carmen N.
    Armas-Molina, Jose V.
    Artiles-Hernandez, Jose L.
    CIRUGIA Y CIRUJANOS, 2024, 92 (02): : 249 - 256
  • [34] Pathology findings after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in patients eligible for active surveillance: Contribution of multiparametric MRI to treatment decision
    Martin-Malburet, A.
    Marcq, G.
    Leroy, X.
    Guiffart, P.
    Fantoni, J. -C.
    Flannand, V.
    Villers, A.
    Puech, P.
    Ouzzane, A.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2018, 28 (8-9): : 425 - 433
  • [35] Selection Criteria for Active Surveillance of Patients with Prostate Cancer in Korea: A Multicenter Analysis of Pathology after Radical Prostatectomy
    Jeong, Chang Wook
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Byun, Seok Soo
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    Seo, Seong Il
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    Ahn, Hanjong
    Kwon, Dong Deuk
    Ha, Hong Koo
    Kwon, Tae Gyun
    Chung, Jae Seung
    Kwak, Cheol
    Kim, Hyung Jin
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 50 (01): : 265 - 274
  • [36] The impact of colorectal cancer and self-efficacy beliefs on work ability and employment status: a longitudinal study
    Bains, M.
    Munir, F.
    Yarker, J.
    Bowley, D.
    Thomas, A.
    Armitage, N.
    Steward, W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2012, 21 (05) : 634 - 641
  • [37] Assessing Work Disability After Radical Prostatectomy
    Gettman, Matthew T.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 70 (01) : 72 - 73
  • [38] Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Experience Measures After Active Surveillance Versus Radiation Therapy Versus Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of Prospective Comparative Studies
    Alberti, Andrea
    Nicoletti, Rossella
    Castellani, Daniele
    Yuan, Yuhong
    Maggi, Martina
    Dibilio, Edoardo
    Resta, Giulio Raffaele
    Makrides, Pantelis
    Sessa, Francesco
    Sebastianelli, Arcangelo
    Serni, Sergio
    Gacci, Mauro
    De Nunzio, Cosimo
    Teoh, Jeremy Y. C.
    Campi, Riccardo
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2024, 7 (06): : 1255 - 1266
  • [39] Limited ability of existing nomograms to predict outcomes in men undergoing active surveillance for prostate cancer
    Wang, Siao-Yi
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Cary, K. Clint
    Chan, June M.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 (6B) : E18 - E24
  • [40] Adjuvant and Salvage Radiotherapy after Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Briganti, Alberto
    Clarke, Noel
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Graefen, Markus
    Ost, Piet
    Zietman, Anthony Laurence
    Roach, Mack, III
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (05) : 689 - 709