Work status and work ability after radical prostatectomy or active surveillance for prostate cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Nilsson, Rasmus [1 ,2 ]
Dahl, Alv A. [2 ,3 ]
Bernklev, Tomm [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Kersten, Hege [6 ]
Haug, Erik S. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Telemark Hosp Trust, Dept Urol, POB 2900, N-3710 Skien, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Radiumhosp, Natl Advisory Unit Late Effects Canc Therapy, Oslo, Norway
[4] Vestfold Hosp Trust, Dept Res & Dev, Tonsberg, Norway
[5] Telemark Hosp Trust, Dept Res & Dev, Skien, Norway
[6] Univ Oslo, Sch Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Biosci, Oslo, Norway
[7] Vestfold Hosp Trust, Dept Urol, Tonsberg, Norway
[8] Oslo Univ Hosp, Inst Canc Genom & Informat, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Active surveillance; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; work status; work ability; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; NORWEGIAN POPULATION; SICK LEAVE; FATIGUE; SURVIVORS; HEALTH; RETURN; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; INSTRUMENT;
D O I
10.1080/21681805.2020.1750473
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Being able to work is important for health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and little is known about work life after radical treatment for prostate cancer (PCa). The aim was to investigate work status (WS) and work ability (WA) after radical prostatectomy (RP) or active surveillance (AS) for PCa, and to identify factors associated with reduced WA. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of 606 men treated with RP (n = 442) or AS (n = 164) at two Norwegian general hospitals. In 2017, they were asked to complete questionnaires measuring adverse effects (AE), HRQoL, aspects of work life and psychological factors at a median of 4.1 (range 1.3-8.1) years after diagnosis. Clinical data were retrieved from medical records. WS was categorized into employed, unemployed or retired. WA was rated using the Work Ability Index. Regression analyses were performed to find factors associated with reduced WA. Results: WS was similar for the RP and AS groups at diagnosis and survey. There was a small reduction in WA from diagnosis to survey and the difference between the RP and AS groups was non-significant. Older age, poorer self-rated health, poorer incontinence score, more chronic fatigue, and increased anxiety and depressive symptoms were associated with reduced WA, while treatment method, urinary bother and use of pads were not. Conclusion: The impact of RP and AS on WS and WA was almost similar. Age and psychological variables were more strongly associated with reduced WA than cancer-related variables.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 200
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Work ability in prostate cancer survivors after radical prostatectomy
    Dahl, Sigrun
    Cvancarova, Milada
    Dahl, Alv A.
    Fossa, Sophie D.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 50 (02) : 116 - 122
  • [2] Influence of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer on work status and working life 3 years after surgery
    Dahl, Sigrun
    Loge, Jon Havard
    Berge, Viktor
    Dahl, Alv Andreas
    Cvancarova, Milada
    Fossa, Sophie Dorothea
    JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2015, 9 (02) : 172 - 179
  • [3] Work after prostate cancer: a systematic review
    McLennan, Vanette
    Ludvik, Dominika
    Chambers, Suzanne
    Frydenberg, Mark
    JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2019, 13 (02) : 282 - 291
  • [4] Influence of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer on work status and working life 3 years after surgery
    Sigrun Dahl
    Jon Håvard Loge
    Viktor Berge
    Alv Andreas Dahl
    Milada Cvancarova
    Sophie Dorothea Fosså
    Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2015, 9 : 172 - 179
  • [5] Pathological Outcome in Men with Prostate Cancer Suitable for Active Surveillance After Radical Prostatectomy
    Tan, Grace
    Ho, Henry
    Huang, Hong Hong
    Cheng, Christopher Wai Sam
    Lau, Weber Kam On
    PROCEEDINGS OF SINGAPORE HEALTHCARE, 2012, 21 (02) : 102 - 108
  • [6] Radical Prostatectomy and Active Surveillance in Prostate Cancer; The Evaluation of Erectile Function and Depression
    Soydan, Hasan
    Malkoc, Ercan
    Dursun, Furkan
    Okcelik, Sezgin
    Ates, Ferhat
    Adayener, Cuneyt
    Baykal, Kadir Vehbi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND ANALYTICAL MEDICINE, 2013, 4 (03) : 189 - 192
  • [7] A cross-sectional study of current work ability after radical prostatectomy
    Dahl, Alv A.
    Brennhovd, Bjorn
    Fossa, Sophie D.
    Axcrona, Karol
    BMC UROLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [8] Fear of Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Cross-sectional Study After Radical Prostatectomy or Active Surveillance
    Nilsson, Rasmus
    Naess-Andresen, Thomas F.
    Myklebust, Tor Age
    Bernklev, Tomm
    Kersten, Hege
    Haug, Erik Skaaheim
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2021, 25 : 44 - 51
  • [9] Active Surveillance Versus Radical Prostatectomy in Favorable-risk Localized Prostate Cancer
    Thomsen, Frederik B.
    Roder, M. Andreas
    Jakobsen, Henrik
    Langkilde, Niels Christian
    Borre, Michael
    Jakobsen, Erik B.
    Frey, Anders
    Lund, Lars
    Lunden, Dagmar
    Dah, Claus
    Brasso, Klaus
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2019, 17 (04) : E814 - E821
  • [10] A comprehensive analysis of cost of an active surveillance cohort compared to radical prostatectomy as primary treatment for prostate cancer
    Pozo, Carmen
    Hernandez, Virginia
    Capitan, Carlos
    de la Pena, Enrique
    Fernandez-Conejo, Guillermo
    del Mar Martinez, Maria
    del Riego, Silvia
    Perez-Fernandez, Elia
    Llorente, Carlos
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 37 (07) : 1297 - 1303