Comparison between freestanding and tooth-connected partially stabilized zirconia implants after two years' function in monkeys: A clinical and histologic study

Statement of problem. Partially stabilized zirconia implants placed by a 1-stage procedure have been previously shown to obtain initial osseointegration under clinically unloaded condition. However, it is unknown whether freestanding and tooth-connected partially stabilized zirconia implants can maintain a long-term direct bone-implant interface. Purpose. This study examined the possibility of the long-term stability of osseointegration around partially stabilized zirconia implants with a 1-stage procedure with different loading designs. Material and methods. Thirty-two partially stabilized zirconia implants were placed into the mandibles of 8 monkeys. Three months after implant placement, 3 types of superstructure were provided in each animal to obtain different concepts of support as (1) single freestanding implant support, (2) connected freestanding implant support, and (3) a combination of implant and tooth support. At 12 and 24 months after loading, clinical, histologic, and histomorphometric evaluations of peri-implant tissues were performed on 28 implants. Results. No clear difference in clinical features was observed among the different types of support. Direct bone apposition to the implant was generally seen in all groups. Histometrically, bone contact ratio ranged between 66% and 81%, and bone area ratio varied between 49% and 78% at 24 months after loading. These values showed almost no difference among single freestanding, connected freestanding, and implant-tooth supports of partially stabilized zirconia implants. Conclusion. In a primate model, partially stabilized zirconia implants placed with a 1-stage procedure achieve long-term stability of osseointegration with the use of single freestanding, connected freestanding, and implant-tooth supports.