Contrast-enhanced ultrasound with dispersion analysis for the localization of prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens

被引:9
作者
Postema, Arnoud W. [1 ]
Gayet, Maudy C. W. [2 ,3 ]
van Sloun, Ruud J. G. [3 ]
Wildeboer, Rogier R. [3 ]
Mannaerts, Christophe K. [1 ]
Savci-Heijink, C. Dilara [4 ]
Schalk, Stefan G. [3 ]
Kajtazovic, Amir [2 ]
van der Poel, Henk [5 ]
Mulders, Peter F. A. [6 ]
Beerlage, Harrie P. [1 ,3 ]
Mischi, Massimo [3 ]
Wijkstra, Hessel [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Urol, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Dept Urol, Henri Dunantstr 1, NL-5223 GZ Shertogenbosch, Netherlands
[3] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Urol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Prostate cancer; Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Dispersion analysis; Radical prostatectomy; Quantitative imaging; MULTIPARAMETRIC ULTRASOUND; AGENT DISPERSION; BIOPSY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ANGIOGENESIS; DIAGNOSIS; DETECT; MRI; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-020-03103-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose To determine the value of two-dimensional (2D) contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging and the additional value of contrast ultrasound dispersion imaging (CUDI) for the localization of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Methods In this multicentre study, subjects scheduled for a radical prostatectomy underwent 2D CEUS imaging preoperatively. CUDI maps were generated from the CEUS recordings. Both CEUS recordings and CUDI maps were scored on the likelihood of presenting csPCa (any Gleason >= 4 + 3 and Gleason 3 + 4 larger than 0.5 mL) by five observers and compared to radical prostatectomy histopathology. An automated three-dimensional (3D) fusion protocol was used to match imaging with histopathology. Receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis was performed per observer and imaging modality. Results 133 of 216 (62%) patients were included in the final analysis. Average area under the ROC for all five readers for CEUS, CUDI and the combination was 0.78, 0.79 and 0.78, respectively. This yields a sensitivity and specificity of 81 and 64% for CEUS, 83 and 56% for CUDI and 83 and 55% for the combination. Interobserver agreement for CEUS, CUDI and the combination showed kappa values of 0.20, 0.18 and 0.18 respectively. Conclusion The sensitivity and specificity of 2D CEUS and CUDI for csPCa localization are moderate. Despite compressing CEUS in one image, CUDI showed a similar performance to 2D CEUS. With a sensitivity of 83% at cutoff point 3, it could become a useful imaging procedure, especially with 4D acquisition, improved quantification and combination with other US imaging techniques such as elastography.
引用
收藏
页码:2811 / 2818
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Poor standard mp-MRI and routine biopsy fail to precisely predict intraprostatic tumor localization [J].
Billing, Andrea ;
Buchner, Alexander ;
Stief, Christian ;
Roosen, Alexander .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 34 (10) :1383-1388
[2]   Multiparametric MRI and targeted prostate biopsy: Improvements in cancer detection, localization, and risk assessment [J].
Bjurlin, Marc A. ;
Mendhiratta, Neil ;
Wysock, James S. ;
Taneja, Samir S. .
CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) :9-18
[3]   Multiparametric Ultrasound of the Prostate: Adding Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound to Real-Time Elastography to Detect Histopathologically Confirmed Cancer [J].
Brock, Marko ;
Eggert, Thilo ;
Palisaar, Rein Jueri ;
Roghmann, Florian ;
Braun, Katharina ;
Loeppenberg, Bjoern ;
Sommerer, Florian ;
Noldus, Joachim ;
von Bodman, Christian .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (01) :93-98
[4]  
Correas J-M, 2013, Diagn Interv Imaging, V94, P551, DOI 10.1016/j.diii.2013.01.017
[5]   Prostate Cancer: Diagnostic Performance of Real-time Shear-Wave Elastography [J].
Correas, Jean-Michel ;
Tissier, Anne-Marie ;
Khairoune, Ahmed ;
Vassiliu, Viorel ;
Mejean, Arnaud ;
Helenon, Olivier ;
Memo, Richard ;
Barr, Richard G. .
RADIOLOGY, 2015, 275 (01) :280-289
[6]   Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy: The role of systematic and targeted biopsies [J].
Filson, Christopher P. ;
Natarajan, Shyam ;
Margolis, Daniel J. A. ;
Huang, Jiaoti ;
Lieu, Patricia ;
Dorey, Frederick J. ;
Reiter, Robert E. ;
Marks, Leonard S. .
CANCER, 2016, 122 (06) :884-892
[7]   Elasticity as a biomarker for prostate cancer: a systematic review [J].
Good, Daniel W. ;
Stewart, Grant D. ;
Hammer, Steven ;
Scanlan, Paul ;
Shu, Wenmiao ;
Phipps, Simon ;
Reuben, Robert ;
McNeill, Alan S. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 113 (04) :523-534
[8]   Multiparametric ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer [J].
Grey, Alistair ;
Ahmed, Hashim U. .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2016, 26 (01) :114-119
[9]   Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review [J].
Haider, M. A. ;
Yao, X. ;
Loblaw, A. ;
Finelli, A. .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 28 (09) :550-567
[10]   Contrast-enhanced US of the prostate with sonazoid: Comparison with whole-mount prostatectomy specimens in 12 patients [J].
Halpern, EJ ;
McCue, PA ;
Aksnes, AK ;
Hagen, EK ;
Frauscher, F ;
Gomella, LG .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 222 (02) :361-366