Protein structure prediction using Rosetta in CASP12

被引:69
作者
Ovchinnikov, Sergey [1 ,2 ]
Park, Hahnbeom [1 ,2 ]
Kim, David E. [2 ,3 ]
DiMaio, Frank [1 ,2 ]
Baker, David [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Biochem, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Inst Prot Design, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Howard Hughes Med Inst, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
ab initio prediction; co-evolution; protein structure prediction; refinement; Rosetta; REFINEMENT; MODELS; SEQUENCE;
D O I
10.1002/prot.25390
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We describe several notable aspects of our structure predictions using Rosetta in CASP12 in the free modeling (FM) and refinement (TR) categories. First, we had previously generated (and published) models for most large protein families lacking experimentally determined structures using Rosetta guided by co-evolution based contact predictions, and for several targets these models proved better starting points for comparative modeling than any known crystal structureour model database thus starts to fulfill one of the goals of the original protein structure initiative. Second, while our human group simply submitted ROBETTA models for most targets, for six targets expert intervention improved predictions considerably; the largest improvement was for T0886 where we correctly parsed two discontinuous domains guided by predicted contact maps to accurately identify a structural homolog of the same fold. Third, Rosetta all atom refinement followed by MD simulations led to consistent but small improvements when starting models were close to the native structure, and larger but less consistent improvements when starting models were further away.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 121
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Case D., 2014, AMBER, V14
[2]   Relaxation of backbone bond geometry improves protein energy landscape modeling [J].
Conway, Patrick ;
Tyka, Michael D. ;
DiMaio, Frank ;
Konerding, David E. ;
Baker, David .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2014, 23 (01) :47-55
[3]  
DiMaio F, 2015, NAT METHODS, V12, P361, DOI [10.1038/NMETH.3286, 10.1038/nmeth.3286]
[4]  
DiMaio F, 2013, NAT METHODS, V10, P1102, DOI [10.1038/NMETH.2648, 10.1038/nmeth.2648]
[5]   Accelerated Profile HMM Searches [J].
Eddy, Sean R. .
PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2011, 7 (10)
[6]   COMPARISON OF SIMPLE POTENTIAL FUNCTIONS FOR SIMULATING LIQUID WATER [J].
JORGENSEN, WL ;
CHANDRASEKHAR, J ;
MADURA, JD ;
IMPEY, RW ;
KLEIN, ML .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1983, 79 (02) :926-935
[7]   Assessing the utility of coevolution-based residue-residue contact predictions in a sequence- and structure-rich era [J].
Kamisetty, Hetunandan ;
Ovchinnikov, Sergey ;
Baker, David .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (39) :15674-15679
[8]   SphereGrinder - reference structure-based tool for quality assessment of protein structural models [J].
Lukasiak, Piotr ;
Antczak, Maciej ;
Ratajczak, Tomasz ;
Blazewicz, Jacek .
PROCEEDINGS 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICINE, 2015, :665-668
[9]   The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server [J].
McGuffin, LJ ;
Bryson, K ;
Jones, DT .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2000, 16 (04) :404-405
[10]   Protein Structure Refinement through Structure Selection and Averaging from Molecular Dynamics Ensembles [J].
Mirjalili, Vahid ;
Feig, Michael .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2013, 9 (02) :1294-1303