Evaluating pain education programs: An integrated approach

被引:14
作者
Dubrowski, Adam [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Morin, Marie-Paule [1 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Learning Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Res Inst, Hosp Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Paediat, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Wilson Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Hosp Sick Children, Div Rheumatol, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[6] CHU St Justine, Div Rheumatol & Immunol, Dept Pediat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Assessment; Pain education; Program evaluation; PERFORMANCE INSTRUMENT IPPI; HEALTH-SCIENCE FACULTIES; COMMUNICATION-SKILLS; TECHNICAL SKILL; CURRICULUM; COMPETENCE;
D O I
10.1155/2011/320617
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Evaluation of educational programs and assessment of learning are essential to maintain high-standard health science education, which includes pain education. Current models of program evaluations applied to the education of the health professions, such as the Kirkpatrick model, are mainly outcome based. More recently, efforts have been made to examine other process-based models such as the Context Input Process Product model. The present article proposes an approach that integrates both outcome and process-based models with models of clinical performance assessment to provide a deeper understanding of a program function. Because assessment instruments are a critical part of program evaluation, it is suggested that standardization and rigour should be used in their selection, development and adaptation. The present article suggests an alternative to currently used models in pain education evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 410
页数:4
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Alkin Marvin C, 2004, Evaluation Roots: Tracing Theorists' Views and Influences, V2, P12, DOI [10.1016/j.stueduc.2008.07.001, 10.4135/9781412984157.]
[2]   THE THEORY-DRIVEN APPROACH TO VALIDITY [J].
CHEN, HT ;
ROSSI, PH .
EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 1987, 10 (01) :95-103
[3]   Validation of an objective structured assessment of technical skill for surgical residents [J].
Faulkner, H ;
Regehr, G ;
Martin, J ;
Reznick, R .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1996, 71 (12) :1363-1365
[4]   An Interfaculty Pain Curriculum: Lessons learned from six years experience [J].
Hunter, Judith ;
Watt-Watson, Judy ;
McGillion, Michael ;
Raman-Wilms, Lalitha ;
Cockburn, Lynn ;
Lax, Leila ;
Stinson, Jennifer ;
Cameron, Andrea ;
Dao, Thuan ;
Pennefather, Peter ;
Schreiber, Martin ;
Librach, Larry ;
Kavanagh, Tricia ;
Gordon, Allan ;
Cullen, Nora ;
Mock, David ;
Salter, Michael .
PAIN, 2008, 140 (01) :74-86
[5]  
Kirkpatrick D.L., 1994, EVALUATING TRAINING
[6]  
Kneebone R, 2007, STUD HEALTH TECHNOL, V125, P229
[7]   Learner-centred feedback using remote assessment of clinical procedures [J].
Kneebone, Roger ;
Bello, Fernando ;
Nestel, Debra ;
Mooney, Neville ;
Codling, Andrew ;
Yadollahi, Faranak ;
Tierney, Tanya ;
Wilcockson, David ;
Darzi, Ara .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2008, 30 (08) :795-801
[8]   Psychometric properties of an integrated assessment of technical and communication skills [J].
LeBlanc, Vicki R. ;
Tabak, Diana ;
Kneebone, Roger ;
Nestel, Debra ;
MacRae, Helen ;
Moulton, Carol-Anne .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 197 (01) :96-101
[9]  
Madaus G.F., 1983, Evaluation models : Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation
[10]   A meta-analysis of Continuing Medical Education effectiveness [J].
Mansouri, Maliheh ;
Lockyer, Jocelyn .
JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2007, 27 (01) :6-15