Modeling Cognitive Load in Mobile Human Computer Interaction Using Eye Tracking Metrics

被引:4
作者
Joseph, Antony William [1 ]
Vaiz, J. Sharmila [2 ]
Murugesh, Ramaswami [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Design, IT Integrated Design, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
[2] Madurai Kamaraj Univ, Dept Comp Applicat, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India
来源
ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (AHFE 2021) | 2021年 / 271卷
关键词
Ocular parameters; Modeling cognitive load; Machine learning; Classification; Eye tracking metrics; Cognitive load levels; Human-computer interaction;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-80624-8_13
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Modeling cognitive load of user interaction based on ocular parameters have become a dominant method for exploring usability evaluation of interfaces for systems and applications. Growing importance of Artificial Intelligence in Human Computer Interaction (HCI) has proposed many approaches to understand users' need and enhance human centric method for interface design. In particular, machine learning-based cognitive modeling, using eye tracking parameters have received more attention in the context of smart devices and applications. In this context, this paper aims to model the estimated cognitive load values for each user into different levels of cognition like very high, high, moderate, low, very low etc., while performing different tasks on a smart phone. The study focuses on the use behavioural measures, ocular parameters along with eight traditional machine learning classification algorithms like Decision Tree, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Naive Bayes, Neural Network, Fuzzy Rules withWeight Factor and K-Nearest Neighbor to model different levels of estimated cognitive load for each participant. The data set for modeling consisted of 250 records, 11 ocular parameters as prediction variables including age and type of task; and three types of classes (2-class, 3-class, 5-class) for classifying the estimated cognitive load for each participant. We noted that, Age, Fixation Count, Saccade Count, Saccade Rate, Average Pupil Dilation are the most important parameters contributing to modeling the estimated cognitive load levels. Further, we observed that, the Decision Tree algorithm achieved highest accuracy for classifying estimated cognitive load values into 2-class (86.8%), 3-class (74%) and 5-class (62.8%) respectively. Finally, from our study, it may be noted that, machine learning is an effective method for predicting 2-class-based (Low and High) cognitive load levels using ocular parameters. The outcome of the study also provides the fact that ageing affects users' cognitive workload while performing tasks on smartphone.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 106
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Response time and eye tracking datasets for activities demanding varying cognitive load
    Pillai, Prarthana
    Ayare, Prathamesh
    Balasingam, Balakumar
    Milne, Kevin
    Biondi, Francesco
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2020, 33
  • [22] Cognitive load classification of mixed reality human computer interaction tasks based on multimodal sensor signals
    Yukang Hou
    Qingsheng Xie
    Ning Zhang
    Jian Lv
    Scientific Reports, 15 (1)
  • [23] In Smart Classroom: Investigating the Relationship between Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Load and Academic Emotion
    Nie, Jing
    Yuan, Yichen
    Chao, Xuewei
    Li, Yang
    Lv, Linze
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2024, 40 (13) : 3528 - 3538
  • [24] Cognitive Objects for Human-Computer Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction
    Moeller, Andreas
    Roalter, Luis
    Kranz, Matthias
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTIONS (HRI 2011), 2011, : 207 - 208
  • [25] Eye-tracking based adaptive user interface: implicit human-computer interaction for preference indication
    Cheng, Shiwei
    Liu, Ying
    JOURNAL ON MULTIMODAL USER INTERFACES, 2012, 5 (1-2) : 77 - 84
  • [26] Eye-tracking based adaptive user interface: implicit human-computer interaction for preference indication
    Shiwei Cheng
    Ying Liu
    Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 2012, 5 : 77 - 84
  • [27] Human-Computer Interaction in Mobile Learning: A Review
    Mashudi, Nurul Amirah
    Izhar, Mohd Azri Mohd
    Aris, Siti Armiza Mohd
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 13 (03) : 566 - 574
  • [28] Computational Modeling in Human-Computer Interaction
    Banovic, Nikola
    Oulasvirta, Antti
    Kristensson, Per Ola
    CHI EA '19 EXTENDED ABSTRACTS: EXTENDED ABSTRACTS OF THE 2019 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2019,
  • [29] User modeling in human-computer interaction
    Fischer, G
    USER MODELING AND USER-ADAPTED INTERACTION, 2001, 11 (1-2) : 65 - 86
  • [30] 4th International Workshop on Pervasive Eye Tracking and Mobile Eye-Based Interaction
    Pfeiffer, Thies
    Stellmach, Sophie
    Sugano, Yusuke
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 ACM INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON PERVASIVE AND UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING (UBICOMP'14 ADJUNCT), 2014, : 1085 - 1091