Composition and functional diversity of fecal bacterial community of wild boar, commercial pig and domestic native pig as revealed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing

被引:27
|
作者
Huang, Jinqing [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Wenjuan [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Rong [3 ]
Liu, Zhanggen [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Tao [1 ,2 ]
Li, Junyi [1 ,2 ]
Du, Tonghao [1 ,2 ]
Xiong, Tao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] State Key Lab Food Sci & Technol, 235 Nanjing East Rd, Nanchang 330047, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Sch Food Sci & Technol, 235 Nanjing East Rd, Nanchang 330047, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Appl Sci, Inst Bioproc & Pharmaceut Technol, Wiesenstr 14, D-35390 Giessen, Germany
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Wild boar; Commercial pig; Domestic native pig; High-throughput sequencing; Bacterial diversity; Function prediction; CHAIN FATTY-ACIDS; GUT MICROBIOTA; NONSTARCH POLYSACCHARIDES; GROWTH-PERFORMANCE; MEAT QUALITY; BODY-WEIGHT; METABOLITES; PHYSIOLOGY; INCREASES; DYSBIOSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00203-019-01787-w
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The bacterial community in mammalian gastrointestinal tract is abundant and complex. To date, little is known about the gut microbiota of wild boar. This study aimed to investigate the fecal bacterial diversity of wild boar and compare with commercial pig and domestic native pig. The diet composition showed that the diets of wild boar, commercial pig and domestic native pig were different from each other. More than 1,760,000 quality-filtered sequences were obtained, and the results revealed distinct compositions and diversity of fecal microbiota in three groups. PCoA and NMDS analyses showed that fecal bacterial communities of wild boar, commercial pig and domestic native pig formed distinctly different clusters. Although the three groups shared a large size of OTUs comprising a core microbiota community, a strong distinction existed at family and genus levels. Ruminococcaceae, Prevotellaceae and Christensenellaceae were more abundant in the feces of wild boar than in domestic native pig and commercial pig. At the genus level, the proportion of unidentified Christensenellaceae was remarkably higher in wild boar group, while commercial pig and domestic native pig group had a higher abundance of Streptococcus and Lactobacillus. Tax4Fun predictions of metagenome function showed statistically significant differences in the functions of fecal microbiota in three groups. There were more bacteria genes with amino acid metabolism, cell growth and death, cell motility, energy metabolism, immune system and environmental adaptation observed in wild boar feces, while commercial pig feces contained more bacteria genes with carbohydrate metabolism, drug resistance, aging, infectious diseases, lipid metabolism, endocrine and metabolic diseases. These results indicated that the fecal microbial ecosystem of the wild boar is significantly different from that of domestic native pig and commercial pig, suggesting that diet is an important factor leading to differences in bacterial abundance and diversity in feces.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 857
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Microbial Diversity of Temperate Pine and Native Forest Soils Profiled by 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Sequencing
    Amoo, Adenike Eunice
    Babalola, Olubukola Oluranti
    MICROBIOLOGY RESOURCE ANNOUNCEMENTS, 2021, 10 (20):
  • [22] Diversity of the bacterial community in the surface soil of a pear orchard based on 16S rRNA gene analysis
    Martinez-Alonso, Maira
    Escolano, Jordi
    Montesinos, Emili
    Gaju, Nuria
    INTERNATIONAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 13 (03) : 123 - 134
  • [23] Bacterial diversity assessment of pristine mangrove microbial community from Dhulibhashani, Sundarbans using 16S rRNA gene tag sequencing
    Basak, Pijush
    Pramanik, Arnab
    Sengupta, Sohan
    Nag, Sudip
    Bhattacharyya, Anish
    Roy, Debojyoti
    Pattanayak, Rudradip
    Ghosh, Abhrajyoti
    Chattopadhyay, Dhrubajyoti
    Bhattacharyya, Maitree
    GENOMICS DATA, 2016, 7 : 76 - 78
  • [24] Toward an Understanding of Changes in Diversity Associated with Fecal Microbiome Transplantation Based on 16S rRNA Gene Deep Sequencing
    Shahinas, Dea
    Silverman, Michael
    Sittler, Taylor
    Chiu, Charles
    Kim, Peter
    Allen-Vercoe, Emma
    Weese, Scott
    Wong, Andrew
    Low, Donald E.
    Pillai, Dylan R.
    MBIO, 2012, 3 (05):
  • [25] 16S rRNA gene sequencing and culture dependent analysis of bacterial diversity associated with commercially processed salads
    Abida, Bano
    Basharat, Ali
    Research Journal of Biotechnology, 2016, 11 (12): : 8 - 16
  • [26] Impact of DNA Sequencing and Analysis Methods on 16S rRNA Gene Bacterial Community Analysis of Dairy Products
    Xue, Zhengyao
    Kable, Mary E.
    Marco, Maria L.
    MSPHERE, 2018, 3 (05)
  • [27] Comparative Analysis of the Fecal Microbiota of Wild and Captive Beal's Eyed Turtle (Sacalia bealei) by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
    Fong, Jonathan J.
    Sung, Yik-Hei
    Ding, Li
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [28] Effect of temperature on the microflora community composition in the digestive tract of the veined rapa whelk (Rapana venosa) revealed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing
    Yang, Mei-Jie
    Song, Hao
    Sun, Li-Na
    Yu, Zheng-Lin
    Hu, Zhi
    Wang, Xiao-Long
    Zhu, Jia-Yi
    Zhang, Tao
    COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY D-GENOMICS & PROTEOMICS, 2019, 29 : 145 - 153
  • [29] Bacterial Community Diversity of Oil-Contaminated Soils Assessed by High Throughput Sequencing of 16S rRNA Genes
    Peng, Mu
    Zi, Xiaoxue
    Wang, Qiuyu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 12 (10): : 12002 - 12015
  • [30] Comparison of Changes in Gut Microbiota in Wild Boars and Domestic Pigs Using 16S rRNA Gene and Metagenomics Sequencing Technologies
    Wei, Limin
    Zhou, Weiying
    Zhu, Zhaojing
    ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (17):