Do people think about absolute or relative price differences when choosing between substitute goods?

被引:27
作者
Azar, Ofer H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Business Adm, Guilford Glazer Fac Business & Management, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
关键词
Consumer behavior; Product differentiation; Loss aversion; Behavioral decision making; LOSS AVERSION; CHOICE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.joep.2011.03.010
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The article presents experimental evidence that shows that people often consider relative price differences in addition to absolute differences when choosing between substitute goods. Because the choice between substitute goods is a very common one, this is an important finding. The experiment uses scenarios in various consumption categories: hotel rooms, flights, and books. Subjects were either students or participants in an economics conference. The data allow to reject the hypothesis that people think only about relative price differences in favor of the hypothesis that people think about both relative and absolute price differences. Whether the price given to the subjects is that of the high-quality good or of the low-quality good makes a large difference, a result that is related to the endowment effect and the status quo bias. Implications of the results for business strategy and other areas are also discussed. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 457
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Large Stakes and Big Mistakes [J].
Ariely, Dan ;
Gneezy, Uri ;
Loewenstein, George ;
Mazar, Nina .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2009, 76 (02) :451-469
[2]  
Azar O. H., 2004, THESIS NW U
[3]  
Azar O.H., 2007, The Journal of Socio-Economics, V36, P1
[4]   The effect of relative thinking on firm strategy and market outcomes: A location differentiation model with endogenous transportation costs [J].
Azar, Ofer H. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 29 (05) :684-697
[5]  
AZAR OH, AM BEHAV SCI
[6]   The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework [J].
Camerer, CF ;
Hogarth, RM .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1999, 19 (1-3) :7-42
[7]  
HERTWIG R, 2003, RATIONALITY WELL BEI, V1, P253
[8]   ANOMALIES - THE ENDOWMENT EFFECT, LOSS AVERSION, AND STATUS-QUO BIAS [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
KNETSCH, JL ;
THALER, RH .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1991, 5 (01) :193-206
[9]   EXPERIMENTAL TESTS OF THE ENDOWMENT EFFECT AND THE COASE THEOREM [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
KNETSCH, JL ;
THALER, RH .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1990, 98 (06) :1325-1348
[10]  
KNETSCH JL, 1989, AM ECON REV, V79, P1277