Liquid biopsy for cancer diagnosis using vibrational spectroscopy: systematic review

被引:15
作者
Anderson, D. J. [1 ,3 ]
Anderson, R. G. [3 ]
Moug, S. J. [3 ]
Baker, M. J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Pure & Appl Chem, WestCHEM, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Strathclyde, ClinSpec Diagnost Technol & Innovat Ctr, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Royal Alexandra Hosp, Clin Res Unit, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Paisley, Renfrew, Scotland
来源
BJS OPEN | 2020年 / 4卷 / 04期
关键词
ENHANCED RAMAN-SPECTROSCOPY; IR SPECTROSCOPY; BREAST-CANCER; SERUM; DIFFERENTIATION; CLASSIFICATION; TRANSLATION; SPECIFICITY; SENSITIVITY; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1002/bjs5.50289
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Vibrational spectroscopy (VS) is a minimally invasive tool for analysing biological material to detect disease. This study aimed to review its application to human blood for cancer diagnosis. Methods A systematic review was undertaken using a keyword electronic database search (MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, TRIP and Cochrane Library), with all original English-language manuscripts examining the use of vibrational spectral analysis of human blood for cancer detection. Studies involving fewer than 75 patients in the cancer or control group, animal studies, or where the primary analyte was not blood were excluded. Results From 1446 results, six studies (published in 2010-2018) examining brain, bladder, oral, breast, oesophageal and hepatic cancer met the criteria for inclusion, with a total population of 2392 (1316 cancer, 1076 control; 1476 men, 916 women). For cancer detection, reported mean sensitivities in each included study ranged from 79 center dot 3 to 98 per cent, with specificities of 82 center dot 8-95 per cent and accuracies between 81 center dot 1 and 97 center dot 1 per cent. Heterogeneity in reporting strategies, methods and outcome measures made meta-analysis inappropriate. Conclusion VS shows high potential for cancer diagnosis, but until there is agreement on uniform standard reporting methods and studies with adequate sample size for valid classification models have been performed, its value in clinical practice will remain uncertain.
引用
收藏
页码:554 / 562
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]  
Kumar Rajesh, 2015, J Med Eng, V2015, P457906, DOI 10.1155/2015/457906
[22]  
Lacombe C, 2015, ANALYST, V140, P2280, DOI [10.1039/c4an01942c, 10.1039/C4AN01942C]
[23]  
Law M, 2003, AM J NEURORADIOL, V24, P1989
[24]   Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Lee, Jeffrey K. ;
Liles, Elizabeth G. ;
Bent, Stephen ;
Levin, Theodore R. ;
Corley, Douglas A. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 160 (03) :171-+
[25]   Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical. Researchers-Part II. Statistical. Methods of Meta-Analysis [J].
Lee, Juneyoung ;
Kim, Kyung Won ;
Choi, Sang Hyun ;
Huh, Jimi ;
Park, Seong Ho .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 16 (06) :1188-1196
[26]  
LI Q, 2017, SENSORS BASEL, V17
[27]   Liquid biopsies [J].
Lianidou, Evi ;
Pantel, Klaus .
GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER, 2019, 58 (04) :219-232
[28]   Biofluid infrared spectro-diagnostics: pre-analytical considerations for clinical applications [J].
Lovergne, L. ;
Bouzy, P. ;
Untereiner, V. ;
Garnotel, R. ;
Baker, M. J. ;
Thiefin, G. ;
Sockalingum, G. D. .
FARADAY DISCUSSIONS, 2016, 187 :521-537
[29]   Investigating pre-analytical requirements for serum and plasma based infrared spectro-diagnostic [J].
Lovergne, Lila ;
Lovergne, Jean ;
Bouzy, Pascaline ;
Untereiner, Valerie ;
Offroy, Marc ;
Garnotel, Roselyne ;
Thiefin, Gerard ;
Baker, Matthew J. ;
Sockalingum, Ganesh D. .
JOURNAL OF BIOPHOTONICS, 2019, 12 (12)
[30]   Comparison of the accuracy of CT colonography and colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer [J].
Martin-Lopez, J. E. ;
Beltran-Calvo, C. ;
Rodriguez-Lopez, R. ;
Molina-Lopez, T. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 16 (03) :O82-O89