Introduction of ROSA robotic-arm system for total knee arthroplasty is associated with a minimal learning curve for operative time

被引:32
作者
Bolam, Scott M. [1 ,2 ]
Tay, Mei Lin [2 ,3 ]
Zaidi, Faseeh [2 ,4 ]
Sidaginamale, Raghavendra P. [5 ]
Hanlon, Michael [1 ]
Munro, Jacob T. [1 ,2 ]
Monk, A. Paul [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Auckland City Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Auckland, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Surg, Bldg 502 20185 Pk Rd, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
[3] North Shore Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Auckland, New Zealand
[4] Univ Auckland, Auckland Bioengn Inst, Auckland, New Zealand
[5] Univ Hosp North Tees, Dept Orthopaed, Stockton On Tees, England
关键词
Learning curve; Operative time; Robotically assisted system; Personalised robotic TKA; ROSA knee system; REVISION;
D O I
10.1186/s40634-022-00524-5
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The introduction of robotics for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) into the operating theatre is often associated with a learning curve and is potentially associated with additional complications. The purpose of this study was to determine the learning curve of robotic-assisted (RA) TKA within a multi-surgeon team. Methods This prospective cohort study included 83 consecutive conventional jig-based TKAs compared with 53 RA TKAs using the Robotic Surgical Assistant (ROSA) system (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) for knee osteoarthritis performed by three high-volume (> 100 TKA per year) orthopaedic surgeons. Baseline characteristics including age, BMI, sex and pre-operative Kellgren-Lawrence graded and Hip-Knee-Ankle Axis were well-matched between the conventional and RA TKA groups. Cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis was used to assess learning curves for operative times for each surgeon. Peri-operative and delayed complications (infection, periprosthetic fracture, thromboembolism, and compromised wound healing) and revisions were reviewed. Results The CUSUM analysis for operative time demonstrated an inflexion point after 5, 6 and 15 cases for each of the three surgeons, or 8.7 cases on average. There were no significant differences (p = 0.53) in operative times between the RA TKA learning (before inflexion point) and proficiency (after inflexion point) phases. Similarly, the operative times of the RA TKA group did not differ significantly (p = 0.92) from the conventional TKA group. There was no discernible learning curve for the accuracy of component planning using the RA TKA system. The average length of post-operative follow-up was 21.3 +/- 9.0 months. There was one revision for instability in the conventional TKA group and none in the RA TKA group. There were no significant difference (p > 0.99) in post-operative complication rates between the conventional TKA and RA TKA groups. Conclusions The introduction of the RA TKA system was associated with a learning curve for operative time of 8.7 cases. Operative times between the RA TKA and conventional TKA group were similar. The short learning curve implies this RA TKA system can be adopted relatively quickly into a surgical team with minimal risks to patients.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Learning Curve of Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty for Non-Fellowship-Trained Orthopedic Surgeons [J].
Ali, Muzaffar ;
Phillips, David ;
Kamson, Anthony ;
Nivar, Isaac ;
Dahl, Raymond ;
Hallock, Richard .
ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2022, 13 :194-198
[2]   Concepts and techniques of a new robotically assisted technique for total knee arthroplasty: the ROSA knee system [J].
Batailler, Cecile ;
Hannouche, Didier ;
Benazzo, Francesco ;
Parratte, Sebastien .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2021, 141 (12) :2049-2058
[3]  
Bloomfield A, 2021, NEW ZEAL MED J, V134, P7
[4]   Are There Differences in Accuracy or Outcomes Scores Among Navigated, Robotic, Patient-specific Instruments or Standard Cutting Guides in TKA? A Network Meta-analysis [J].
Bouche, Pierre-Alban ;
Corsia, Simon ;
Dechartres, Agnes ;
Resche-Rigon, Matthieu ;
Nizard, Remy .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 478 (09) :2105-2116
[5]   Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty Who is Satisfied and Who is Not? [J].
Bourne, Robert B. ;
Chesworth, Bert M. ;
Davis, Aileen M. ;
Mahomed, Nizar N. ;
Charron, Kory D. J. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (01) :57-63
[6]   Predicting total knee replacement pain [J].
Brander, VA ;
Stulberg, SD ;
Adams, AD ;
Harden, RN ;
Bruehl, S ;
Stanos, SP ;
Houle, T .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2003, (416) :27-36
[7]   Knee replacement [J].
Carr, Andrew J. ;
Robertsson, Otto ;
Graves, Stephen ;
Price, Andrew J. ;
Arden, Nigel K. ;
Judge, Andrew ;
Beard, David J. .
LANCET, 2012, 379 (9823) :1331-1340
[8]  
Chow S-C., 2007, Sample size calculations in clinical research, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781584889830
[9]   The learning curve associated with robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY [J].
Kayani, B. ;
Konan, S. ;
Pietrzak, J. R. T. ;
Huq, S. S. ;
Tahmassebi, J. ;
Haddad, F. S. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2018, 100B (08) :1033-1042
[10]   Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY [J].
Kayani, B. ;
Konan, S. ;
Tahmassebi, J. ;
Pietrzak, J. R. T. ;
Haddad, F. S. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2018, 100B (07) :930-937