Improving students' self-evaluation of learning for key concepts in textbook materials

被引:85
作者
Rawson, Katherine A. [1 ]
Dunlosky, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Kent State Univ, Dept Psychol, Kent, OH 44242 USA
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY | 2007年 / 19卷 / 4-5期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/09541440701326022
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Why do students have difficulties judging the correctness of information they recall ( e. g., definitions of key concepts in textbooks), and how can students improve their judgement accuracy? To answer these questions, we had college students read six expository passages, each including four key terms with definitions. After reading a text, each key term was presented, and participants ( a) attempted to recall the corresponding definition and ( b) self-scored the correctness of the response ( incorrect, partially correct, or entirely correct). Participants were overconfident, with inflated judgements for responses that were objectively incorrect. When participants could inspect correct definitions while judging their responses, judgement accuracy improved. Counterintuitively, however, some overconfidence remained. We discuss implications of these results for theory, education, and the two questions posed above.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 579
页数:21
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Does momentary accessibility influence metacomprehension judgments? The influence of study-judgment lags on accessibility effects [J].
Baker, JMC ;
Dunlosky, J .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2006, 13 (01) :60-65
[2]   The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index [J].
Benjamin, AS ;
Bjork, RA ;
Schwartz, BL .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1998, 127 (01) :55-68
[3]   Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting [J].
Butler, Andrew C. ;
Roediger, Henry L., III .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 19 (4-5) :514-527
[4]  
Cull WL, 2000, APPL COGNITIVE PSYCH, V14, P215, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(200005/06)14:3<215::AID-ACP640>3.3.CO
[5]  
2-T
[6]   Why does rereading improve metacomprehension accuracy? Evaluating the levels-of-disruption hypothesis for the rereading effect [J].
Dunlosky, J ;
Rawson, KA .
DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 2005, 40 (01) :37-55
[7]   What constrains the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments? Testing the transfer-appropriate-monitoring and accessibility hypotheses [J].
Dunlosky, J ;
Rawson, KA ;
Middleton, EL .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2005, 52 (04) :551-565
[8]  
DUNLOSKY J, 2002, APPL METACOGNITION, P68, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511489976.005
[9]  
Hacker DJ, 1998, EDUC PSYCHO, P165
[10]   REPEATED PRESENTATION AND RECALL OF MEANINGFUL PROSE [J].
HOWE, MJA .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 61 (03) :214-+