A fitted finite volume method for stochastic optimal control problems in finance

被引:4
作者
Nyoumbi, Christelle Dleuna [1 ]
Tambue, Antoine [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Abomey Calavi, Inst Math & Sci Phys, BP 613, Porto Novo, Benin
[2] Western Norway Univ Appl Sci, Dept Comp Sci Elect Engn & Math Sci, Inndalsveien 28, N-5063 Bergen, Norway
[3] Univ Cape Town, Ctr Res Computat & Appl Mech CERECAM, Dept Math & Appl Math, ZA-7701 Rondebosch, South Africa
来源
AIMS MATHEMATICS | 2021年 / 6卷 / 04期
关键词
stochastic optimal control; dynamic programming; HJB equations; finite volume method; finite difference method; degenerate parabolic operator; proper operator; viscosity solutions; DIFFERENCE APPROXIMATIONS; VISCOSITY SOLUTIONS; BELLMAN EQUATIONS; CONVERGENCE; SCHEMES;
D O I
10.3934/math.2021186
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
In this article, we provide a numerical method based on fitted finite volume method to approximate the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation coming from stochastic optimal control problems in one and two dimensional domain. The computational challenge is due to the nature of the HJB equation, which may be a second-order degenerate partial differential equation coupled with optimization. For such problems, standard scheme such as finite difference losses its monotonicity and therefore the convergence toward the viscosity solution may not be guarantee. In the work, we discretize the HJB equation using the fitted finite volume method, which has for main feature to tackle the degeneracy of the equation. The time discretisation is performed using the Implicit Euler method, which is unconditionally stable. We show that matrices resulting from spatial discretization and temporal discretization are M-matrices. The optimization problem is solved at every time step using iterative method. Numerical results are presented to show the robustness of the fitted finite volume numerical method comparing to the standard finite difference method.
引用
收藏
页码:3053 / 3079
页数:27
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] ALLEN DND, 1955, QUART J MECH APPL MA, V8, P129, DOI [DOI 10.1093/QJMAM/8.2.129, 10.1093/qjmam/8.2.129.]
  • [2] Angermann L, 2007, NUMER MATH, V106, P1, DOI 10.1007/S00211-006-0057-7
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1999, ELECTRON J PROBAB
  • [4] Barles G., 1991, Asymptotic Analysis, V4, P271
  • [5] Benezet C., NUMERICAL SCHEME QUA
  • [6] USERS GUIDE TO VISCOSITY SOLUTIONS OF 2ND-ORDER PARTIAL-DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
    CRANDALL, MG
    ISHII, H
    LIONS, PL
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY, 1992, 27 (01) : 1 - 67
  • [7] VISCOSITY SOLUTIONS OF HAMILTON-JACOBI EQUATIONS
    CRANDALL, MG
    LIONS, PL
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY, 1983, 277 (01) : 1 - 42
  • [8] Debrabant K, 2013, MATH COMPUT, V82, P1433
  • [9] Forsyth P. A., 2007, Journal of Computational Finance, V11, P1
  • [10] Henderson V., EXECUTIVE STOCK OPTI