The Next Step Trial: Impact of a worksite colorectal cancer screening promotion program

被引:59
作者
Tilley, BC
Vernon, SW
Myers, R
Glanz, K
Lu, M
Hirst, K
Kristal, AR
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Houston, TX 77225 USA
[2] Henry Ford Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Biostat & Res Epidemiol, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Dept Med, Div Med Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[5] Univ Hawaii, Canc Res Ctr Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96813 USA
[6] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[7] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Canc Prevent Res Program, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
关键词
colorectal cancer; screening; clinical trial;
D O I
10.1006/pmed.1998.0427
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. The Next Step Trial was a randomized trial of worksite colorectal cancer screening promotion and nutrition interventions for automobile industry employees at increased risk of colorectal cancer. Interventions were tested at 28 worksites with 5,042 employees. This, report describes results of the screening promotion intervention, Methods. Worksites randomized to the control group received a standard program including rectal examination, fecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy, Intervention worksites received an enhanced program (i.e., standard program plus an educational booklet/telephone call), Compliance (i.e,, completion of all recommended screening examinations) and coverage (i.e., completion of at lease one screening examination), the primary and secondary outcomes, were measured over 2 years. Results. In the 2 years prior to baseline, 61% of employees had been screened, After random assignment, baseline differences in several employee characteristics and worksite screening procedures were detected, including moro past history of screening in control worksites. After adjusting for differences, we found modest, but higher, compliance and coverage in intervention compared with control worksites (odds ratio [95% confidence limits] = 1.46 [1.1-2.0] and 1.33 [1.1, 1.6], respectively). Conclusions: Adding a personally tailored behavioral intervention to a standard colorectal cancer screening program can promote continued employee participation in screening as measured by compliance. Further research is needed to assess intervention effects in other populations. (C)1999 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 283
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1974, HLTH BELIEF MODEL PE
[2]  
BANDURA A, 1986, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A
[3]   American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: Update 1997 [J].
Byers, T ;
Levin, B ;
Rothenberger, D ;
Dodd, GD ;
Smith, RA .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1997, 47 (03) :154-&
[4]   FECAL OCCULT BLOOD SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA IN A TARGETED HIGH-RISK POPULATION [J].
CAFFAREY, SM ;
BROUGHTON, CIM ;
MARKS, CG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 80 (11) :1399-1400
[5]  
*CDC, 1997, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V46, P421
[6]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1996, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V45, P107
[7]   RANDOMIZATION BY CLUSTER - SAMPLE-SIZE REQUIREMENTS AND ANALYSIS [J].
DONNER, A ;
BIRKETT, N ;
BUCK, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1981, 114 (06) :906-914
[8]  
Faivre J, 1991, Eur J Cancer Prev, V1, P49
[9]  
Fishbein Martin., 1975, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research
[10]   CONCORDANCE OF SELF-REPORTED DATA AND MEDICAL RECORD AUDIT FOR 6 CANCER SCREENING PROCEDURES [J].
GORDON, NP ;
HIATT, RA ;
LAMPERT, DI .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (07) :566-570