A population based assessment of complications following outpatient hydrocelectomy and spermatocelectomy

被引:50
作者
Kiddoo, DA [1 ]
Wollin, TA [1 ]
Mador, DR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Royal Alexandra Hosp, Div Urol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
hydrocele; spermatocele; scrotum; postoperative complications; wound infection;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000103636.61790.43
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We determine the incidence of complications following outpatient scrotal surgery for the treatment of hydroceles and spermatoceles. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of all patients undergoing hydrocelectomy or spermatocelectomy between April 1, 1997 and March 31, 1999 at 1 institution was performed. The hospital and office charts were reviewed, and postoperative complications (infection, persistent swelling, chronic pain) were recorded. The type of preoperative antiseptic preparation (iodine based versus chlorhexidine) and the presence or absence of surgical drains were also recorded. Results: A total of 161 patients were included in the study with an average age of 53.7 years. The overall complication rate was 19.2%. Infection/scrotal abscess formation occurred in 9.3% of patients, persistent swelling (treatment failure) in 9.3% and chronic pain in 0.6%. There was no significant difference in the complication rate when the preoperative preparations and the presence or absence of surgical drains were compared. Conclusions: The most common complications following scrotal surgery for hydroceles and spermatoceles are persistent scrotal swelling, inflammation and postoperative infection. Further prospective investigation is required to study factors such as the use of drains, preoperative and/or perioperative antibiotics and the type of surgical preparations, which may have a role in complication rates.
引用
收藏
页码:746 / 748
页数:3
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   LORDS PROCEDURE - THE BEST OPERATION FOR HYDROCELE [J].
ALBRECHT, W ;
HOLTL, W ;
AHARINEJAD, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 68 (02) :187-189
[2]  
CRUSE PJE, 1980, SURG CLIN N AM, V60, P27
[3]  
DAHL DS, 1972, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V104, P40
[4]   RESULTS OF WINDOW OPERATION FOR PRIMARY HYDROCELE [J].
JAHNSON, S ;
JOHANSSON, JE .
UROLOGY, 1993, 41 (01) :27-28
[5]   Risk factors for penile prosthetic infection [J].
Jarow, JP .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (02) :402-404
[6]   The excisional, plication and internal drainage techniques: a comparison of the results for idiopathic hydrocele [J].
Ku, JH ;
Kim, ME ;
Lee, NK ;
Park, YH .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 87 (01) :82-84
[7]  
Lavelle MA, 1996, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V78, P541
[8]   Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999 [J].
Mangram, AJ ;
Horan, TC ;
Pearson, ML ;
Silver, LC ;
Jarvis, WR .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 20 (04) :250-278
[9]   TURBAN SCROTAL DRESSING [J].
MANSON, AL ;
MACDONALD, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1987, 137 (02) :238-239
[10]  
Miroglu C., 1994, International Urology and Nephrology, V26, P673, DOI 10.1007/BF02767724