Common capacity-limited neural mechanisms of selective attention and spatial working memory encoding

被引:31
|
作者
Fusser, Fabian [1 ]
Linden, David E. J. [1 ,2 ]
Rahm, Benjamin [3 ,4 ]
Hampel, Harald [1 ]
Haenschel, Corinna [1 ,5 ]
Mayer, Jutta S. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Dept Psychiat Psychosomat Med & Psychotherapy, D-60528 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Cardiff Univ, Sch Psychol, Cardiff CF10 3AT, S Glam, Wales
[3] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Inst Med Psychol, D-60528 Frankfurt, Germany
[4] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Univ Med Ctr, D-55128 Mainz, Germany
[5] City Univ London, Dept Psychol, London EC1V 0HB, England
[6] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Psychol, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
attention; cognitive processing; eye movements; fMRI; working memory; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; VISUAL-SEARCH; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; EYE-MOVEMENTS; CORTICAL ACTIVITY; FUNCTIONAL MRI; COVERT SHIFTS; FMRI; MAINTENANCE; SACCADES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07794.x
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
One characteristic feature of visual working memory (WM) is its limited capacity, and selective attention has been implicated as limiting factor. A possible reason why attention constrains the number of items that can be encoded into WM is that the two processes share limited neural resources. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have indeed demonstrated commonalities between the neural substrates of WM and attention. Here we investigated whether such overlapping activations reflect interacting neural mechanisms that could result in capacity limitations. To independently manipulate the demands on attention and WM encoding within one single task, we combined visual search and delayed discrimination of spatial locations. Participants were presented with a search array and performed easy or difficult visual search in order to encode one, three or five positions of target items into WM. Our fMRI data revealed colocalised activation for attention-demanding visual search and WM encoding in distributed posterior and frontal regions. However, further analysis yielded two patterns of results. Activity in prefrontal regions increased additively with increased demands on WM and attention, indicating regional overlap without functional interaction. Conversely, the WM load-dependent activation in visual, parietal and premotor regions was severely reduced during high attentional demand. We interpret this interaction as indicating the sites of shared capacity-limited neural resources. Our findings point to differential contributions of prefrontal and posterior regions to the common neural mechanisms that support spatial WM encoding and attention, providing new imaging evidence for attention-based models of WM encoding.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 838
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Visual spatial attention and spatial working memory do not draw on shared capacity-limited core processes
    Howard, Christina J.
    Pole, Rebekah
    Montgomery, Paulina
    Woodward, Amanda
    Guest, Duncan
    Standen, Bradley
    Kent, Christopher
    Crowe, Emily M.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 73 (05): : 799 - 818
  • [2] Common neural mechanisms supporting spatial working memory, attention and motor intention
    Ikkai, Akiko
    Curtis, Clayton E.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2011, 49 (06) : 1428 - 1434
  • [3] Common Neural Mechanisms Control Attention and Working Memory
    Zhou, Ying
    Curtis, Clayton E.
    Sreenivasan, Kartik K.
    Fougnie, Daryl
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 42 (37): : 7110 - 7120
  • [4] Attention to multiple locations is limited by spatial working memory capacity
    Close, Alex
    Sapir, Ayelet
    Burnett, Katherine
    d'Avossa, Giovanni
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2014, 14 (09):
  • [5] Exploring Haptic Working Memory as a Capacity-Limited Information Channel
    Lerch, Rachel A.
    Cui, Hengjun
    Patwardhan, Soham
    Visell, Yon
    Sims, Chris R.
    IEEE HAPTICS SYMPOSIUM 2016, 2016, : 113 - 118
  • [6] Selective attention on representations in working memory: cognitive and neural mechanisms
    Ku, Yixuan
    PEERJ, 2018, 6
  • [7] Spatial working memory and spatial attention rely on common neural processes in the intraparietal sulcus
    Silk, Timothy J.
    Bellgrove, Mark A.
    Wrafter, Pia
    Mattingley, Jason B.
    Cunnington, Ross
    NEUROIMAGE, 2010, 53 (02) : 718 - 724
  • [8] Spatial Separation and Working Memory Capacity Affect Selective Visual Attention in the Periphery
    Klatt, Stefanie
    Smeeton, Nicholas J.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [9] Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory
    Awh, E
    Jonides, J
    TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2001, 5 (03) : 119 - 126
  • [10] Working Memory Capacity Depends on Attention Control, but Not Selective Attention
    Kotyusov, Alexander I.
    Kasanov, Dauren
    Kosachenko, Alexandra I.
    Gashkova, Anastasia S.
    Pavlov, Yuri G.
    Malykh, Sergey
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (02)