Maternal experience of pain during external cephalic version at term

被引:27
作者
Fok, WY [1 ]
Chan, LW [1 ]
Leung, TY [1 ]
Lau, TK [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
external cephalic version; pain;
D O I
10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00505.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background This study was designed to investigate maternal pain perception during external cephalic version (ECV). Methods This prospective study included 97 pregnant women with singleton breech presentation at or above 36 weeks of gestation undergoing ECV. No analgesia or anesthesia were used during ECV. The women were asked to rate the degree of pain on a 10-cm visual analog scale after ECV. Results Ninety-eight ECVs were performed and the overall success rate was 66%. The median pain score was 5.7 (interquartile range 2.7-6.8). The visual analog pain score was significantly lower among those with a successful ECV than those with a failed procedure (median score 4.6 vs. 6.8, p < 0.001). Similarly, those procedures rated as easy by the operator were associated with a significantly lower pain score (3.4 vs. 6.4, p < 0.001). However, the pain score was not found to be related to the operator, parity or placental site. Among the five subjects with a pain score of 8.5 and beyond, the ECV procedure was still successful in four (80%). Conclusion ECV performed without analgesia was associated with a moderate degree of pain that was well tolerated by the majority of patients because of its short duration.
引用
收藏
页码:748 / 751
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   The effect of intrathecal analgesia on the success of external cephalic version [J].
Birnbach, DJ ;
Matut, J ;
Stein, DJ ;
Campagnuolo, J ;
Drimbarean, C ;
Grunebaum, A ;
Kuroda, MM ;
Thys, DM .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 93 (02) :410-413
[2]   Nulliparous active labor, epidural analgesia, and cesarean delivery for dystocia [J].
Bofill, JA ;
Vincent, RD ;
Ross, EL ;
Martin, RW ;
Norman, PF ;
Werhan, CF ;
Morrison, JC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 177 (06) :1465-1470
[3]   Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial [J].
Hannah, ME ;
Hannah, WJ ;
Hewson, SA ;
Hodnett, ED ;
Saigal, S ;
Willan, AR .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9239) :1375-1383
[4]   Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term [J].
Lau, TK ;
Lo, KWK ;
Rogers, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 176 (01) :218-223
[5]   Predictors of successful external cephalic version at term: A prospective study [J].
Lau, TK ;
Lo, KWK ;
Wan, D ;
Rogers, MS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1997, 104 (07) :798-802
[6]   Epidural analgesia for cephalic version: A randomized trial [J].
Mancuso, KM ;
Yancey, MK ;
Murphy, JA ;
Markenson, GR .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (05) :648-651
[7]   Reattempting failed external cephalic version under epidural anesthesia [J].
Neiger, R ;
Hennessy, MD ;
Patel, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 179 (05) :1136-1139
[8]  
PEEL JH, 1948, J OBSTET GYN BRIT EM, V55, P614
[9]   GENTLE ART OF EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION [J].
RANNEY, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1973, 116 (02) :239-251
[10]   RELIABILITY OF A LINEAR ANALOG FOR EVALUATING PAIN [J].
REVILL, SI ;
ROBINSON, JO ;
ROSEN, M ;
HOGG, MIJ .
ANAESTHESIA, 1976, 31 (09) :1191-1198