Group climate, cohesion, alliance, and empathy in group psychotherapy: Multilevel structural equation models

被引:189
作者
Johnson, JE
Burlingame, GM
Olsen, JA
Davies, DR
Gleave, RL
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Psychol, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[2] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Sociol, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[3] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Counseling Psychol & Special Educ, Provo, UT 84602 USA
关键词
group psychotherapy; therapeutic relationship; structural equation modeling; cohesion; alliance;
D O I
10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.310
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This study examined the definitional and statistical overlap among 4 key group therapeutic relationship constructs-group climate, cohesion, alliance, and empathy-across member-member, member-group, and member-leader relationships. Three multilevel structural equation models were tested using self-report measures completed by 662 participants from 111 counseling center and personal growth groups. As hypothesized, almost all measures of therapeutic relationship were significantly correlated. Hypothesized 1-factor, 2-factor (Working and Bonding factors), and 3-factor (Member, Leader, and Group factors) models did not fit the data adequately. An exploratory model with Bonding, Working, and Negative factors provided the best fit to the data. Group members distinguished among relationships primarily according to relationship quality rather than the status or role of others (i.e., leader, member, or whole group).
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 321
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Allen M.J., 1979, Introduction to measurement theory
[2]  
Bales R.F., 1979, SYMLOG SYSTEM MULTIP
[3]   Therapeutic alliance: Predicting continuance and success in group treatment for spouse abuse [J].
Brown, PD ;
O'Leary, KD .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 68 (02) :340-345
[4]   COHESION, ALLIANCE AND OUTCOME IN GROUP-PSYCHOTHERAPY [J].
BUDMAN, SH ;
SOLDZ, S ;
DEMBY, A ;
FELDSTEIN, M ;
SPRINGER, T ;
DAVIS, MS .
PSYCHIATRY-INTERPERSONAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1989, 52 (03) :339-350
[5]   Cohesion in group psychotherapy [J].
Burlingame, GM ;
Fuhriman, A ;
Johnson, JE .
PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2001, 38 (04) :373-379
[6]   ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE VERSUS BOOTSTRAP PROCEDURES FOR ANALYZING DEPENDENT OBSERVATIONS IN SMALL-GROUP RESEARCH [J].
BURLINGAME, GM ;
KIRCHER, JC ;
HONTS, CR .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 1994, 25 (04) :486-501
[7]  
BURLINGAME GM, 1994, HDB GROUP PSYCHOTHER, P41
[8]  
Burlingame GM., 2003, HDB PSYCHOTHERAPY BE, V5, P647
[9]  
Burns David D., 1996, P135
[10]   COPING STYLES, HOMEWORK COMPLIANCE, AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL-THERAPY [J].
BURNS, DD ;
NOLENHOEKSEMA, S .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 59 (02) :305-311