Outcome of Cesarean Myomectomy: Is it a Safe Procedure?

被引:18
作者
Senturk, Mehmet Baki [1 ]
Polat, Mesut [1 ]
Dogan, Ozan [1 ]
Pulatoglu, Cigdem [2 ]
Yardimci, Oguz Devrim [1 ]
Karakus, Resul [3 ,4 ]
Tayyar, Ahter Tanay [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Medeniyet Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Bayburt Govt Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ibni Sina St, TR-69000 Bayburt, Turkey
[3] Zeynep Kamil Training & Res Hosp, Dept Obstet, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Zeynep Kamil Training & Res Hosp, Dept Gynecol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
cesarean section; cesarean myomectomy; complications; myoma; UTERINE ARTERY LIGATION; SECTION; LEIOMYOMAS; PREGNANCY; DELIVERY; COMPLICATIONS; FIBROIDS; MYOMA; RISK;
D O I
10.1055/s-0043-120918
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective Myomectomy performed during cesarean section is still controversial because of the potential for associated complications, especially with large myomas. Many obstetricians avoid performing cesarean myomectomy procedures because of the risk of uncontrollable hemorrhage. However, the prevalence of pregnant women with myomas is increasing, leading to an increase in the likelihood that physicians will encounter this issue. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes and complications of patients who either had or did not have cesarean myomectomy. Method A total of 361 patients were evaluated in this retrospective study. Patients who had cesarean section with myomectomy and patients had cesarean section without myomectomy were compared with regard to demographics, drop in hemoglobin levels, complications, blood transfusion rates and duration of operation. These parameters were also compared when the diameter of the myoma was larger than 5 cm. Values of p < 0.01 and p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. ResultsWhile maternal age and gravidity were similar in both groups (p > 0.05), themean myoma diameter was smaller and the duration of operation was longer in the group who underwent cesarean myomectomy (p < 0.05). The reduction in hemoglobin level, rate of complications, and number of transfusions were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion This study shows that myomectomy during cesarean section does not increase complications or transfusion rates and appears to be a safe procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:1200 / 1206
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Myomectomy during Caesarean Birth in Fibroid-Endemic, Low-Resource Settings [J].
Awoleke, J. O. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 2013
[2]  
BROWN D, 1997, W IND MED J S2, V46, P45
[3]   Hemostatic technique for myomectomy during cesarean section [J].
Cobellis, L ;
Pecori, E ;
Cobellis, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2002, 79 (03) :261-262
[4]   Electro-cautery of myomas during caesarean section - two case reports [J].
Cobellis, L ;
Florio, P ;
Stradella, L ;
De Lucia, E ;
Messalli, EM ;
Petraglia, F ;
Cobellis, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2002, 102 (01) :98-99
[5]   Complications in pregnancy, labor, and delivery with uterine leiomyomas: A population-based study [J].
Coronado, GD ;
Marshall, LM ;
Schwartz, SM .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (05) :764-769
[6]  
DAVIS JL, 1990, OBSTET GYNECOL, V75, P41
[7]   A novel technique of selective uterine devascularization before myomectomy at the time of cesarean section: a pilot study [J].
Desai, Babasaheb R. ;
Patted, Shobhana S. ;
Pujar, Yashita V. ;
Sherigar, Bhavana Y. ;
Das, Sasmita R. ;
Ruge, Jayashree C. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (01) :362-364
[8]   UTERINE MYOMA IN PREGNANCY [J].
Glavind, Karin ;
Palvio, Doris H. B. ;
Lauritsen, Jorgen Glenn .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1990, 69 (7-8) :617-619
[9]   Myomectomy of a massive uterine myoma during cesarean section under regional anesthesia [J].
Huang, Yueh-Ping ;
Hsu, Ming-Che ;
Lee, Chien-Nan ;
Fan, Shou-Zen ;
Chen, Li-Kuei .
TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 54 (02) :196-197
[10]   Myomectomy during cesarean section [J].
Kaymak, O ;
Ustunyurt, E ;
Okyay, RE ;
Kalyoncu, S ;
Mollamahmutoglu, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2005, 89 (02) :90-93