Patient decision aid in vaccination: a systematic review of the literature

被引:14
作者
Bruel, S. [1 ,2 ]
Leclercq, T. [1 ]
Ginzarly, M. [3 ]
Botelho-Nevers, E. [4 ,5 ]
Frappe, P. [1 ]
Gagneux-Brunon, A. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Jean Monnet Univ, Dept Gen Practice, 10 Rue Marandiere, F-42270 St Etienne, France
[2] St Etienne Univ, Claude Bernard Lyon Univ 1, Univ Lyon, HESPER EA, Saint Etienne, France
[3] Dubai Int Financial Ctr, The Clin, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
[4] CHU St Etienne, CIC INSERM 1408, St Etienne, France
[5] Univ Lyon, Jean Monnet Univ, Grp Immunite Muqueuses & Agents Pathogenes EA 306, Lyon, France
关键词
Decision making; decision support techniques; decision aid; vaccination; health communication; vaccine hesitancy; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PARENTS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1080/14760584.2020.1742111
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction: Decision-making for patients and their families in the field of vaccination is difficult, involving many multidimensional factors. The complexity of this process is directly responsible for the phenomenon of vaccine hesitancy. Decision aids are instruments that provide information on a specific subject, explaining the advantages and disadvantages of a decision in a personalized way, thus clarifying the patient's values. Areas covered: A systematic review using PRISMA guidelines was conducted to carry out an inventory of decision aids in the field of vaccination and assess their impact on vaccine coverage and decisional conflict. Expert opinion: Decision aids reduce decision-making conflict and could be good tools to address the phenomenon of vaccine hesitancy. It seems essential to integrate health professionals and patients into the design of future decision aids. This would simplify the use of these tools during the consultation. However, their effect on vaccine coverage remains uncertain. Further studies seem necessary in order to conclude that vaccination coverage is effective.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 311
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Spread of Measles in Europe and Implications for US Travelers
    Angelo, Kristina M.
    Gastanaduy, Paul A.
    Walker, Allison T.
    Patel, Manisha
    Reef, Susan
    Lee, C. Virginia
    Nemhauser, Jeffrey
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2019, 144 (01)
  • [2] Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to improve vaccination coverage in children, adolescents, and adults
    Briss, PA
    Rodewald, LE
    Hinman, AR
    Shefer, AM
    Strikas, RA
    Bernier, RR
    Carande-Kulis, VG
    Yusuf, HR
    Ndiaye, SM
    Williams, SM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 18 (01) : 97 - 140
  • [3] Impact of the Ottawa Influenza Decision Aid on healthcare personnel's influenza immunization decision: a randomized trial
    Chambers, L. W.
    Wilson, K.
    Hawken, S.
    Puxty, J.
    Crowe, L.
    Lam, P. -P.
    Farmanova-Haynes, E.
    McNeil, S. A.
    McCarthy, A. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2012, 82 (03) : 194 - 202
  • [4] GUIDING INDIVIDUAL DECISIONS - A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL OF DECISION-ANALYSIS
    CLANCY, CM
    CEBUL, RD
    WILLIAMS, SV
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 84 (02) : 283 - 288
  • [5] Toward interactive, Internet-based decision aid for vaccination decisions: Better information alone is not enough
    Connolly, Terry
    Reb, Jochen
    [J]. VACCINE, 2012, 30 (25) : 3813 - 3818
  • [6] Effect of a Health Care Professional Communication Training Intervention on Adolescent Human Papillomavirus Vaccination A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial
    Dempsey, Amanda F.
    Pyrznawoski, Jennifer
    Lockhart, Steven
    Barnard, Juliana
    Campagna, Elizabeth J.
    Garrett, Kathleen
    Fisher, Allison
    Dickinson, L. Miriam
    O'Leary, Sean T.
    [J]. JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2018, 172 (05)
  • [7] The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions
    Downs, SH
    Black, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1998, 52 (06) : 377 - 384
  • [8] Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process
    Elwyn, Glyn
    O'Connor, Annette
    Stacey, Dawn
    Volk, Robert
    Edwards, Adrian
    Coulter, Angela
    Thomson, Richard
    Barrat, Alexandra
    Butow, Phyllis
    Barry, Michael
    Mulley, Albert G.
    Sepucha, Karen
    Bernstein, Steven
    Clarke, Aileen
    Entwistle, Vikki
    Feldman-Stewart, Deb
    Holmes-Rovner, Margaret
    Llewellyn-Thomas, Hilary
    Moumjid, Nora
    Ruland, Cornelia
    Sykes, Alan
    Whelan, Tim
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7565): : 417 - 419
  • [9] *EUR CTR DIS PREV, 2019, WHO IS RISK MEASL EU, P32
  • [10] A postpartum vaccination promotion intervention using motivational interviewing techniques improves short-term vaccine coverage: PromoVac study
    Gagneur, Arnaud
    Lemaitre, Thomas
    Gosselin, Virginie
    Farrands, Anne
    Carrier, Nathalie
    Petit, Genevieve
    Valiquette, Louis
    De Wals, Philippe
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 18