Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology versus Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Increases the Quality of Intraoperative Imaging?

被引:8
作者
Schulz-Wendtland, R. [1 ]
Dilbat, G. [2 ]
Bani, M. [3 ]
Fasching, P. A. [3 ]
Lux, M. P. [3 ]
Wenkel, E. [1 ]
Schwab, S. [4 ]
Loehberg, C. R. [3 ]
Jud, S. M. [3 ]
Rauh, C. [3 ]
Bayer, C. M. [3 ]
Beckmann, M. W. [5 ]
Uder, M. [4 ]
Meier-Meitinger, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikums Erlangen, Inst Radiol, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Radiol Roth, Radiol, Roth, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Univ Frauenklin, Erlangen, Germany
[4] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Inst Radiol, Erlangen, Germany
[5] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Frauenklin, Erlangen, Germany
关键词
breast; mammographic density; mammography; breast cancer; PALPABLE BREAST-LESIONS; SPECIMEN RADIOGRAPHY; CANCER RISK; THERAPY; MICROCALCIFICATIONS; MAGNIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS; EXCISION; MORTALITY; BIOPSIES;
D O I
10.1055/s-0032-1314942
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim: The aim of this prospective clinical study was to assess whether it would be possible to reduce the rate of re-excisions and improve the quality using CMOS technology or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) compared to a conventional FFDM system. Material and Methods: An invasive breast cancer (BI-RADS 5) was diagnosed in 200 patients in the period from 5/2011 to 1/2012. After histological verification, a breast-conserving therapy was performed with intraoperative imaging. Three different imaging systems were used: 1) Inspiration (TM) (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), amorphous selenium, tungsten source, focus 0.1 mm, resolution 85 mu m pixel pitch, 8 l/mm as the standard; 2) BioVision (TM) (Bioptics, Tucson, USA), flat panel photodiode array, tungsten source, focus 0.05, resolution 50 mu m pixel pitch, 12 l/mm; 3) Tomosynthesis (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), amorphous selenium, tungsten source, focus 0.1 mm, resolution 85 mu m pixel pitch, 8 l/mm, range: 50 degrees, 25 projections, scan time > 20 s, geometry: uniform scanning, reconstruction: filtered back projection. The 600 radiograms were prospectively shown to 3 radiologists. Results: Out of a total of 200 patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer (BI-RADS 6) 156 patients required no further operative therapy (re-excision) after breast-conserving therapy. A retrospective analysis (n = 44) showed an increase in sensitivity with tomosynthesis compared to the BioVision (TM) (CMOS technology) and the Inspiration (TM) at a magnification of 1.0 : 1.0 of 8% (p < 0.05), i.e. re-excision would not have been necessary in 16 patients with tomosynthesis. Conclusions: The sensitivity of tomosynthesis for intraoperative radiography is significantly (p < 0.05) higher compared to both CMOS technology and an FFDM system with a conventional detector. Additional studies using higher magnification, e.g. 2.0 : 1.0, but no zooming will be necessary to evaluate the method further.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 538
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [31] Pilot Study on the Detection of Simulated Lesions Using a 2D and 3D Digital Full-Field Mammography System with a Newly Developed High Resolution Detector Based on Two Shifts of a-Se
    Schulz-Wendtland, R.
    Bani, M.
    Lux, M. P.
    Schwab, S.
    Loehberg, C. R.
    Jud, S. M.
    Rauh, C.
    Bayer, C. M.
    Beckmann, M. W.
    Uder, M.
    Fasching, P. A.
    Adamietz, B.
    Meier-Meitinger, M.
    [J]. GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2012, 72 (05) : 408 - 411
  • [32] Use of Tomosynthesis in Intraoperative Digital Specimen Radiography - Is a Reduction of Breast Re-excision Rates Possible?
    Schulz-Wendtland, R.
    Dilbat, G.
    Bani, M. R.
    Lux, M. P.
    Meier-Meitinger, M.
    Wenkel, E.
    Schwab, S.
    Beckmann, M. W.
    Uder, M.
    Adamietz, B.
    [J]. GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2011, 71 (12) : 1080 - 1084
  • [33] CMOS Technology for Intraoperative Digital Imaging Can the Re-excision Rate after Breast Surgery be Reduced?
    Schulz-Wendtland, R.
    Bani, M. R.
    Lux, M. P.
    Meier-Meitinger, M.
    Adamietz, B.
    Wenkel, E.
    Schwab, S.
    Beckmann, M. W.
    Uder, M.
    [J]. GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2011, 71 (06) : 525 - 529
  • [34] Digital mammography: An update
    Schulz-Wendtland, R.
    Fuchsjaeger, M.
    Wacker, T.
    Hermann, K. -P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 72 (02) : 258 - 265
  • [35] Quo vadis? Trends in Digital Mammography
    Schulz-Wendtland, R.
    Wenkel, E.
    Wacker, T.
    Hermann, K. -P.
    [J]. GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2009, 69 (02) : 108 - 117
  • [36] Breast tomosynthesis in clinical practice: initial results
    Teertstra, Hendrik J.
    Loo, Claudette E.
    van den Bosch, Maurice A. A. J.
    van Tinteren, Harm
    Rutgers, Emiel J. T.
    Muller, Sara H.
    Gilhuijs, Kenneth G. A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (01) : 16 - 24
  • [37] Wallis M, 2007, EUR RADIOL, V17, P581, DOI 10.1007/s00330-006-0408-x