Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology versus Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Increases the Quality of Intraoperative Imaging?

被引:8
作者
Schulz-Wendtland, R. [1 ]
Dilbat, G. [2 ]
Bani, M. [3 ]
Fasching, P. A. [3 ]
Lux, M. P. [3 ]
Wenkel, E. [1 ]
Schwab, S. [4 ]
Loehberg, C. R. [3 ]
Jud, S. M. [3 ]
Rauh, C. [3 ]
Bayer, C. M. [3 ]
Beckmann, M. W. [5 ]
Uder, M. [4 ]
Meier-Meitinger, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikums Erlangen, Inst Radiol, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Radiol Roth, Radiol, Roth, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Univ Frauenklin, Erlangen, Germany
[4] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Inst Radiol, Erlangen, Germany
[5] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Frauenklin, Erlangen, Germany
关键词
breast; mammographic density; mammography; breast cancer; PALPABLE BREAST-LESIONS; SPECIMEN RADIOGRAPHY; CANCER RISK; THERAPY; MICROCALCIFICATIONS; MAGNIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS; EXCISION; MORTALITY; BIOPSIES;
D O I
10.1055/s-0032-1314942
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim: The aim of this prospective clinical study was to assess whether it would be possible to reduce the rate of re-excisions and improve the quality using CMOS technology or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) compared to a conventional FFDM system. Material and Methods: An invasive breast cancer (BI-RADS 5) was diagnosed in 200 patients in the period from 5/2011 to 1/2012. After histological verification, a breast-conserving therapy was performed with intraoperative imaging. Three different imaging systems were used: 1) Inspiration (TM) (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), amorphous selenium, tungsten source, focus 0.1 mm, resolution 85 mu m pixel pitch, 8 l/mm as the standard; 2) BioVision (TM) (Bioptics, Tucson, USA), flat panel photodiode array, tungsten source, focus 0.05, resolution 50 mu m pixel pitch, 12 l/mm; 3) Tomosynthesis (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), amorphous selenium, tungsten source, focus 0.1 mm, resolution 85 mu m pixel pitch, 8 l/mm, range: 50 degrees, 25 projections, scan time > 20 s, geometry: uniform scanning, reconstruction: filtered back projection. The 600 radiograms were prospectively shown to 3 radiologists. Results: Out of a total of 200 patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer (BI-RADS 6) 156 patients required no further operative therapy (re-excision) after breast-conserving therapy. A retrospective analysis (n = 44) showed an increase in sensitivity with tomosynthesis compared to the BioVision (TM) (CMOS technology) and the Inspiration (TM) at a magnification of 1.0 : 1.0 of 8% (p < 0.05), i.e. re-excision would not have been necessary in 16 patients with tomosynthesis. Conclusions: The sensitivity of tomosynthesis for intraoperative radiography is significantly (p < 0.05) higher compared to both CMOS technology and an FFDM system with a conventional detector. Additional studies using higher magnification, e.g. 2.0 : 1.0, but no zooming will be necessary to evaluate the method further.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 538
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [21] KURZL R, 1981, J GYNECOL OBST BIO R, V10, P431
  • [22] A new specimen radiography system with maximal 20fold magnification for breast specimens
    Moritz, JD
    Westerhof, JP
    Funke, M
    Breiter, N
    Oestmann, JW
    Grabbe, E
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1998, 168 (02): : 133 - 138
  • [23] Intra-operative specimen analysis using faxitron microradiography for excision of mammographically suspicious, non-palpable breast lesions
    Muttalib, M
    Tisdall, M
    Scawn, R
    Shousha, S
    Cummins, RS
    Sinnett, HD
    [J]. BREAST, 2004, 13 (04) : 307 - 315
  • [24] Digital Tomosynthesis in breast imaging
    Niklason, LT
    Christian, BT
    Niklason, LE
    Kopans, DB
    Castleberry, DE
    OpsahlOng, BH
    Landberg, CE
    Slanetz, PJ
    Giardino, AA
    Moore, R
    Albagli, D
    DeJule, MC
    Fitzgerald, PF
    Fobare, DF
    Giambattista, BW
    Kwasnick, RF
    Liu, JQ
    Lubowski, SJ
    Possin, GE
    Richotte, JF
    Wei, CY
    Wirth, RF
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 (02) : 399 - 406
  • [25] Quality assurance in the diagnosis of breast disease
    Perry, NM
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 37 (02) : 159 - 172
  • [26] Digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography
    Poplack, Steven P.
    Tosteson, Tor D.
    Kogel, Christine A.
    Nagy, Helene M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (03) : 616 - 623
  • [27] Report of the 32nd Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 10-13,2009 "An International Scientific Symposium for Interaction and Exchange Among Basic Scientists and Clinicians in Breast Cancer"
    Ruckhaeberle, E.
    Rody, A.
    Kaufmann, M.
    [J]. GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2010, 70 (03) : 177 - 183
  • [28] Conference Report on the 31st Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 10-14, 2008 "Continuing Change in Diagnostics and Therapy of Breast Cancers - from Molecular Basics to Tailored Therapy"
    Ruckhaeberle, E.
    Solbach, C.
    Kaufmann, M.
    [J]. GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2009, 69 (03) : 202 - 211
  • [29] Comparing the clinical value of spot view mammography with reduced pixel size to monitor zooming by reporting microcalcifications in digital mammography
    Schulz-Wendtland, R.
    Hermann, K.-P.
    Wenkel, E.
    Adamietz, B.
    Lell, M.
    Boehner, C.
    Uder, M.
    Bautz, W. A.
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2007, 179 (05): : 492 - 496
  • [30] Experimental phantom lesion detectability study using a digital breast tomosynthesis prototype system
    Schulz-Wendtland, R.
    Wenkel, E.
    Lell, M.
    Boehner, C.
    Bautz, W. A.
    Mertelmeier, T.
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2006, 178 (12): : 1219 - 1223