Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology versus Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Increases the Quality of Intraoperative Imaging?

被引:8
作者
Schulz-Wendtland, R. [1 ]
Dilbat, G. [2 ]
Bani, M. [3 ]
Fasching, P. A. [3 ]
Lux, M. P. [3 ]
Wenkel, E. [1 ]
Schwab, S. [4 ]
Loehberg, C. R. [3 ]
Jud, S. M. [3 ]
Rauh, C. [3 ]
Bayer, C. M. [3 ]
Beckmann, M. W. [5 ]
Uder, M. [4 ]
Meier-Meitinger, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikums Erlangen, Inst Radiol, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Radiol Roth, Radiol, Roth, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Univ Frauenklin, Erlangen, Germany
[4] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Inst Radiol, Erlangen, Germany
[5] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Frauenklin, Erlangen, Germany
关键词
breast; mammographic density; mammography; breast cancer; PALPABLE BREAST-LESIONS; SPECIMEN RADIOGRAPHY; CANCER RISK; THERAPY; MICROCALCIFICATIONS; MAGNIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS; EXCISION; MORTALITY; BIOPSIES;
D O I
10.1055/s-0032-1314942
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim: The aim of this prospective clinical study was to assess whether it would be possible to reduce the rate of re-excisions and improve the quality using CMOS technology or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) compared to a conventional FFDM system. Material and Methods: An invasive breast cancer (BI-RADS 5) was diagnosed in 200 patients in the period from 5/2011 to 1/2012. After histological verification, a breast-conserving therapy was performed with intraoperative imaging. Three different imaging systems were used: 1) Inspiration (TM) (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), amorphous selenium, tungsten source, focus 0.1 mm, resolution 85 mu m pixel pitch, 8 l/mm as the standard; 2) BioVision (TM) (Bioptics, Tucson, USA), flat panel photodiode array, tungsten source, focus 0.05, resolution 50 mu m pixel pitch, 12 l/mm; 3) Tomosynthesis (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), amorphous selenium, tungsten source, focus 0.1 mm, resolution 85 mu m pixel pitch, 8 l/mm, range: 50 degrees, 25 projections, scan time > 20 s, geometry: uniform scanning, reconstruction: filtered back projection. The 600 radiograms were prospectively shown to 3 radiologists. Results: Out of a total of 200 patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer (BI-RADS 6) 156 patients required no further operative therapy (re-excision) after breast-conserving therapy. A retrospective analysis (n = 44) showed an increase in sensitivity with tomosynthesis compared to the BioVision (TM) (CMOS technology) and the Inspiration (TM) at a magnification of 1.0 : 1.0 of 8% (p < 0.05), i.e. re-excision would not have been necessary in 16 patients with tomosynthesis. Conclusions: The sensitivity of tomosynthesis for intraoperative radiography is significantly (p < 0.05) higher compared to both CMOS technology and an FFDM system with a conventional detector. Additional studies using higher magnification, e.g. 2.0 : 1.0, but no zooming will be necessary to evaluate the method further.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 538
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Albert US, 2008, S3 LEITLINIE BRUSTKR
  • [2] Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy
    Bani, M. R.
    Lux, M. P.
    Heusinger, K.
    Wenkel, E.
    Magener, A.
    Schulz-Wendtland, R.
    Beckmann, M. W.
    Fasching, P. A.
    [J]. EJSO, 2009, 35 (01): : 32 - 37
  • [3] Zurich Consensus: German Expert Opinion on the St. Gallen Votes on 15 March 2009 (11 th International Conference at St. Gallen: Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer) 2009 St. Gallen Conference: Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer - Opinion among German Experts (Zurich 2009)
    Beckmann, M. W.
    Blohmer, J-U
    Costa, S-D
    Diedrich, K.
    Diel, I.
    Eiermann, W.
    Friese, K.
    Gerber, B.
    Harbeck, N.
    Hilfrich, J.
    Janni, W.
    Jaenicke, F.
    Jonat, W.
    Kaufmann, M.
    Kiechle, M.
    Koehler, U.
    Kreienberg, R.
    von Minckwitz, G.
    Moebus, V.
    Nitz, U.
    Schneeweiss, A.
    Thomssen, C.
    Wallwiener, D.
    [J]. GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2009, 69 (05) : 377 - 383
  • [4] Intraoperative digital radiography for diagnosis of non-palpable breast lesions
    Diekmann, F
    Grebe, S
    Bick, U
    Winzer, KJ
    Paepke, S
    Hamm, B
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2000, 172 (12): : 969 - 971
  • [5] MANAGEMENT OF THE BREAST SPECIMEN
    DORSI, CJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1995, 194 (02) : 297 - 302
  • [6] Breast Cancer Risk - Genes, Environment and Clinics
    Fasching, P. A.
    Ekici, A. B.
    Adamietz, B. R.
    Wachter, D. L.
    Hein, A.
    Bayer, C. M.
    Haeberle, L.
    Loehberg, C. R.
    Jud, S. M.
    Heusinger, K.
    Ruebner, M.
    Rauh, C.
    Bani, M. R.
    Lux, M. P.
    Schulz-Wendtland, R.
    Hartmann, A.
    Beckmann, M. W.
    [J]. GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2011, 71 (12) : 1056 - 1066
  • [7] Breast Cancer Therapy - A State of the Art Review
    Fasching, P. A.
    Fehm, T.
    Janni, W.
    Kuemmel, S.
    Lueftner, D.
    Lux, M. P.
    Maass, N.
    [J]. GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2010, 70 (11) : 875 - 886
  • [8] Digital breast tomosynthesis: A pilot observer study
    Good, Walter F.
    Abrams, Gordon S.
    Catullo, Victor J.
    Chough, Denise M.
    Ganott, Marie A.
    Hakim, Christiane M.
    Gur, David
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (04) : 865 - 869
  • [9] Magnified radiographs as quality control for detection of microcalcifications in histopathology of breast biopsies
    Grunert, JH
    Flemming, P
    Borchert, B
    Farber, A
    Gmelin, E
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2000, 172 (01): : 68 - 72
  • [10] Compression-free biplanar radiography of the breast specimen with a specimen device
    Grunert, JH
    Wiechmann, U
    Gmelin, E
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2003, 175 (03): : 413 - 417