Effects of time and duration of short-day treatments under long-day conditions on flowering of a quantitative short-day sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) 'Sunrich Orange'

被引:8
|
作者
Yanez, Paola [1 ]
Chinone, Shunpei [1 ]
Hirohata, Ritsuko [1 ]
Ohno, Hajime [1 ]
Ohkawa, Kiyoshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Shizuoka Univ, Fac Agr, Shizuoka 4228529, Japan
关键词
Ornamental sunflower; Flowering; Photoperiod; PHOTOPERIOD; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.scienta.2012.03.008
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
The effects of short-day (SD) treatment on differentiation, development and anthesis of flower buds, and on cut flower quality were investigated in a leading cut sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cultivar, Sunrich Orange, a quantitative SD plant. Plants were cultivated under long-day (LD) conditions with night interruption lighting from 2200 to 200 h. SD treatment (11.5 h photoperiod) for 1, 2, or 3 weeks was commenced at the cotyledon, two true leaves, or four true leaves stage. The control plants were grown under LD conditions throughout the experimental period. SD treatment for 1 or 2 weeks promoted flower bud initiation even when delivered at the cotyledon stage (9 days after sowing), indicating that the juvenile phase is very short in this cultivar. Flower differentiation and development were also accelerated by the SD treatment, and resulted in 19-39 days earlier anthesis. The quality of cut flowers was improved by SD treatment to desirable characteristics such as decreased weight, shortened stem and reduced stem diameter. The present study suggests that under LD conditions such as found in summer, SD treatment for 2 weeks from the cotyledon or two true leaves stage can promote LD-delayed flowering of quantitative SD sunflower plants without reducing cut flower quality. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 11
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LONG-DAY INDUCTION IN A SHORT-DAY INDUCTIVE ARTHROPOD, DAPHNIA PULEX
    STROSS, RG
    AMERICAN ZOOLOGIST, 1969, 9 (03): : 594 - &
  • [22] Differential expression of Arabidopsis EJC core proteins under short-day and long-day growth conditions
    Sahoo, Annapurna
    Satapathy, Kunja Bihari
    PLANT SCIENCE TODAY, 2021, 8 (04): : 815 - 819
  • [25] EFFECTS OF MELATONIN ON LONG-DAY RESPONSES IN SHORT-DAY HOUSED ADULT SIBERIAN HAMSTERS
    BARTNESS, TJ
    GOLDMAN, BD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 255 (05): : R823 - R830
  • [26] Post-flowering photoperiod effects on reproductive development and agronomic traits of long-day and short-day crops
    Han, T
    Wu, C
    Mentreddy, RS
    Zhao, J
    Xu, X
    Gai, J
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 2005, 191 (04) : 255 - 262
  • [27] Comparative responses of long-day and short-day plants to relative length of day and night
    Garner, WW
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1933, 8 (03) : 347 - 356
  • [28] NO FLOWERING IN SHORT DAY (NFL) is a bHLH transcription factor that promotes flowering specifically under short-day conditions in Arabidopsis
    Sharma, Nidhi
    Xin, Ruijiao
    Kim, Dong-Hwan
    Sung, Sibum
    Lange, Theo
    Huq, Enamul
    DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 143 (04): : 682 - 690
  • [29] Tomato SlCDF3 Delays Flowering Time by Regulating Different FT-Like Genes Under Long-Day and Short-Day Conditions
    Xu, Dawei
    Li, Xueou
    Wu, Xue
    Meng, Lili
    Zou, Zhirong
    Bao, Encai
    Bian, Zhonghua
    Cao, Kai
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2021, 12
  • [30] DEVELOPMENT OF GIBBERELLIN-INDUCED OVULATE STROBILUS OF WESTERN RED CEDAR - QUANTITATIVE REQUIREMENT FOR LONG-DAY -] SHORT-DAY -] LONG-DAY
    PHARIS, RP
    MORF, W
    OWENS, JN
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1969, 47 (03): : 415 - &