Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) selection using fuzzy multicriteria decision making methods

被引:97
作者
Yazdani-Chamzini, Abdolreza [1 ]
Yakhchali, Siamak Haji [2 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, S Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran, Dept Ind Engn, Coll Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM); Fuzzy AHP; Fuzzy TOPSIS; MCDM; TOPSIS METHOD; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; MULTIPLE CRITERIA; INTEGRATED MODEL; GHOMROUD TUNNEL; ENVIRONMENT; AHP; SETS; CONSTRUCTION; EXTENSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.021
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The problem of Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) selection has a significant impact on the speed and cost of excavating sector; so that it is a strategic issue. On the other hand, selecting the optimum TBM among a pool of alternatives is a multicriteria decision making (MCDM) problem. In this paper, an evaluation model based on the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and another fuzzy MCDM technique, namely fuzzy technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is developed to help the tunneling designers in the process of the TBM selection under fuzzy environment where the vagueness and uncertainty are taken into account with linguistic variables parameterized by triangular fuzzy numbers. The fuzzy AHP is applied to form the structure of the TBM selection problem and to determine weights of the evaluation criteria, and fuzzy TOPSIS method is utilized to acquire final ranking. A real world case study is illustrated in order to demonstrate the potential of the proposed model for the TBM selection issue. It demonstrates the effectiveness and capability of the proposed model. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 204
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   MULTIPLE CRITERIA CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT DECISIONS CONSIDERING RELATIONS BETWEEN CRITERIA [J].
Antucheviciene, Jurgita ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ;
Zakarevicius, Algimantas .
TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2010, 16 (01) :109-125
[2]   Extension of fuzzy TOPSIS method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets [J].
Ashtiani, Behzad ;
Haghighirad, Farzad ;
Makui, Ahmad ;
Montazer, Golam Ali .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2009, 9 (02) :457-461
[3]   A hybrid approach based on SERVQUAL and fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluating transportation service quality [J].
Awasthi, Anjali ;
Chauhan, Satyaveer S. ;
Omrani, Hichem ;
Panahi, Ariyo .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 61 (03) :637-646
[4]   Performance measurement model for Turkish aviation firms using the rough-AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment [J].
Aydogan, Emel Kizilkaya .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (04) :3992-3998
[5]   MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS WITH FUZZY PAIRWISE COMPARISONS [J].
BOENDER, CGE ;
DEGRAAN, JG ;
LOOTSMA, FA .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 29 (02) :133-143
[6]   FUZZY HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS [J].
BUCKLEY, JJ .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 17 (03) :233-247
[7]  
Chang D.-Y., 1992, Optimization Techniques and Applications, V1, P352
[8]   Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP [J].
Chang, DY .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 95 (03) :649-655
[9]   The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis [J].
Chen, Ting-Yu ;
Tsao, Chueh-Yung .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2008, 159 (11) :1410-1428
[10]  
Ebrahimnejad Sadoullah, 2009, International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, V1, P38, DOI 10.1504/IJBCRM.2009.028950