Should we design buildings that are less sensitive to occupant behaviour? A simulation study of effects of behaviour and design on office energy consumption

被引:45
作者
Karjalainen, Sami [1 ]
机构
[1] VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland Ltd, POB 1000, FI-02044 Espoo, Vtt, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Behaviour change; Building design; Robust design; Energy conservation; Energy efficiency; Control system; Usability; Personal control; ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION; SAVING ENERGY; USER BEHAVIOR; FEEDBACK; CONSERVATION; PATTERNS; COMFORT; INTERVENTION; REDUCTION; PRIVATE;
D O I
10.1007/s12053-015-9422-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In an ideal world, occupants have an understanding of how building systems work and are motivated to use the systems as they were designed to be. There is considerable evidence, however, that occupants do not understand the principles of how buildings function and that they use the systems non-optimally. The purpose of the paper is to quantify the effect of occupant behaviour on energy consumption and show how it is affected by design strategies. Numerical simulations of an office were performed with the dynamic thermal simulation software TRNSYS. Three types of behaviour ('careless', 'normal', and 'conscious') and two types of design ('ordinary' and 'robust') were considered. The results show that the effect of occupant behaviour on energy consumption is greatly diminished with robust design solutions, solutions that make buildings less sensitive to occupant behaviour. The careless user consumes 75-79 % less energy if the robust design solutions are applied rather than the ordinary design solutions. It is argued that a realistic view of occupant behaviour is advantageous in the creation of energy-efficient buildings (that is, leaving less need to learn how buildings work, to be motivated to save energy, or to perform specific energy-saving actions). However, the possibility of personal control should not be eliminated.
引用
收藏
页码:1257 / 1270
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation
    Abrahamse, W
    Steg, L
    Vlek, C
    Rothengatter, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 25 (03) : 273 - 291
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, ADV METERING INITIAT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, ASHRAE Handbook|Fundamentals
  • [4] Boerstra A, 2013, ARCHIT SCI REV, V56, P30, DOI 10.1080/00038628.2012.744298
  • [5] Brager G.S., 2004, ASHRAE Transactions, V110, P17
  • [6] Motivating energy conservation in the workplace: An evaluation of the use of group-level feedback and peer education
    Carrico, Amanda R.
    Riemer, Manuel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 31 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [7] Promoting behaviour change through personalized energy feedback in offices
    Coleman, Michael J.
    Irvine, Katherine N.
    Lemon, Mark
    Shao, Li
    [J]. BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2013, 41 (06) : 637 - 651
  • [8] D2 National Building Code of Finland, 2003, IND CLIM VENT BUILD
  • [9] Darby S, 2001, ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES AND LIGHTING, P685
  • [10] Saving power to conserve your reputation? The effectiveness of private versus public information
    Delmas, Magali A.
    Lessem, Neil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 67 (03) : 353 - 370