Identifying differential transcription factor binding in ChIP-seq

被引:30
|
作者
Wu, Dai-Ying [1 ]
Bittencourt, Danielle [1 ]
Stallcup, Michael R. [1 ]
Siegmund, Kimberly D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol, Kenneth Norris Jr Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Dept Prevent Med, Kenneth Norris Jr Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
EXPRESSION ANALYSIS; GENOME; BIOCONDUCTOR; ELEMENTS; PACKAGE; SITES; MODEL;
D O I
10.3389/fgene.2015.00169
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
ChIP seq is a widely used assay to measure genome-wide protein binding. The decrease in costs associated with sequencing has led to a rise in the number of studies that investigate protein binding across treatment conditions or cell lines. In addition to the identification of binding sites, new studies evaluate the variation in protein binding between conditions. A number of approaches to study differential transcription factor binding have recently been developed. Several of these methods build upon established methods from RNA-seq to quantify differences in read counts. We compare how these new approaches perform on different data sets from the ENCODE project to illustrate the impact of data processing pipelines under different study designs. The performance of normalization methods for differential ChIP-seq depends strongly on the variation in total amount of protein bound between conditions, with total read count outperforming effective library size, or variants thereof, when a large variation in binding was studied. Use of input subtraction to correct for non-specific binding showed a relatively modest impact on the number of differential peaks found and the fold change accuracy to biological validation, however a larger impact might be expected for samples with more extreme copy number variations between them. Still, it did identify a small subset of novel differential regions while excluding some differential peaks in regions with high background signal. These results highlight proper scaling for between-sample data normalization as critical for differential transcription factor binding analysis and suggest bioinformaticians need to know about the variation in level of total protein binding between conditions to select the best analysis method. At the same time, validation using fold-change estimates from qRT-PCR suggests there is still room for further method improvement.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] coMOTIF: a mixture framework for identifying transcription factor and a coregulator motif in ChIP-seq Data
    Xu, Mengyuan
    Weinberg, Clarice R.
    Umbach, David M.
    Li, Leping
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2011, 27 (19) : 2625 - 2632
  • [12] FROM BINDING MOTIFS IN CHIP-SEQ DATA TO IMPROVED MODELS OF TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR BINDING SITES
    Kulakovskiy, Ivan
    Levitsky, Victor
    Oshchepkov, Dmitry
    Bryzgalov, Leonid
    Vorontsov, Ilya
    JOURNAL OF BIOINFORMATICS AND COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2013, 11 (01)
  • [13] Pooled ChIP-Seq Links Variation in Transcription Factor Binding to Complex Disease Risk
    Tehranchi, Ashley K.
    Myrthil, Marsha
    Martin, Trevor
    Hie, Brian L.
    Golan, David
    Fraser, Hunter B.
    CELL, 2016, 165 (03) : 730 - 741
  • [14] Five-Vertebrate ChIP-seq Reveals the Evolutionary Dynamics of Transcription Factor Binding
    Schmidt, Dominic
    Wilson, Michael D.
    Ballester, Benoit
    Schwalie, Petra C.
    Brown, Gordon D.
    Marshall, Aileen
    Kutter, Claudia
    Watt, Stephen
    Martinez-Jimenez, Celia P.
    Mackay, Sarah
    Talianidis, Iannis
    Flicek, Paul
    Odom, Duncan T.
    SCIENCE, 2010, 328 (5981) : 1036 - 1040
  • [15] A practical comparison of methods for detecting transcription factor binding sites in ChIP-seq experiments
    Teemu D Laajala
    Sunil Raghav
    Soile Tuomela
    Riitta Lahesmaa
    Tero Aittokallio
    Laura L Elo
    BMC Genomics, 10
  • [16] Identification of transcription factor binding sites from ChIP-seq data at high resolution
    Bardet, Anais F.
    Steinmann, Jonas
    Bafna, Sangeeta
    Knoblich, Juergen A.
    Zeitlinger, Julia
    Stark, Alexander
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2013, 29 (21) : 2705 - 2713
  • [17] A practical comparison of methods for detecting transcription factor binding sites in ChIP-seq experiments
    Laajala, Teemu D.
    Raghav, Sunil
    Tuomela, Soile
    Lahesmaa, Riitta
    Aittokallio, Tero
    Elo, Laura L.
    BMC GENOMICS, 2009, 10
  • [18] ChIP-Seq Data Completion and Transcription Factors Binding Analyses
    Huang, De-Shuang
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICINE (BIBM), 2017, : 7 - 7
  • [19] Role of ChIP-seq in the discovery of transcription factor binding sites, differential gene regulation mechanism, epigenetic marks and beyond
    Mundade, Rasika
    Ozer, Hatice Gulcin
    Wei, Han
    Prabhu, Lakshmi
    Lu, Tao
    CELL CYCLE, 2014, 13 (18) : 2847 - 2852
  • [20] Extracting transcription factor targets from ChIP-Seq data
    Tuteja, Geetu
    White, Peter
    Schug, Jonathan
    Kaestner, Klaus H.
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2009, 37 (17) : e113 - e113