The NMDA receptor intracellular C-terminal domains reciprocally interact with allosteric modulators

被引:16
作者
Sapkota, Kiran [1 ]
Dore, Kim [2 ,3 ]
Tang, Kang [1 ]
Irvine, Mark [4 ]
Fang, Guangyu [4 ]
Burnell, Erica S. [5 ]
Malinow, Roberto [2 ,3 ]
Jane, David E. [4 ]
Monaghan, Daniel T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Pharmacol & Expt Neurosci, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Neurosci, Ctr Neural Circuits & Behav, San Diego, CA 92093 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Div Biol, Sect Neurobiol, San Diego, CA 92093 USA
[4] Univ Bristol, Sch Physiol Pharmacol & Neurosci, Ctr Synapt Plast, Biomed Sci Bldg, Bristol BS8 1TD, Avon, England
[5] Natl Univ Ireland Galway, Sch Chem, Galway H91TK33, Ireland
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
N-methyl-D-aspartate; C-terminal domain; Phosphorylation; Allosteric modulators; Desensitization; Fluorescence resonance energy transfer; D-ASPARTATE RECEPTORS; PREGNENOLONE-SULFATE; NONCOMPETITIVE INHIBITION; PHOSPHORYLATION; DESENSITIZATION; CALMODULIN; MECHANISM; SUBUNITS; EXCITOTOXICITY; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.bcp.2018.11.018
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) have multiple prominent roles in CNS function but their excessive or insufficient activity contributes to neuropathological/psychiatric disorders. Consequently, a variety of positive and negative allosteric modulators (PAMs and NAMs, respectively) have recently been developed. Although these modulators bind to extracellular domains, in the present report we find that the NMDAR's intracellular C-terminal domains (CTDs) significantly influence PAM/NAM activity. GluN2 CTD deletion robustly affected NAM and PAM activity with both enhancing and inhibiting effects that were compound-specific and NMDAR subunit specific. In three cases, individual PAMs became NAMs at specific GluN2-truncated receptors. In contrast to GIuN2, GIuN1 CTD removal only reduced PAM activity of UBP684 and CIQ, and did not affect NAM activity. Consistent with these findings, agents altering phosphorylation state or intracellular calcium levels displayed receptor-specific and compound-specific effects on PAM activity. It is possible that the GluN2's M4 domain transmits intracellular modulatory signals from the CTD to the M1/M4 channel gating machinery and that this site is a point of convergence in the direct or indirect actions of several PAMs/NAMs thus rendering them sensitive to CTD status. Thus, allosteric modulators are likely to have a marked and varied sensitivity to post translational modifications, protein-protein associations, and intracellular ions. The interaction between PAM activity and NMDAR CTDs appears reciprocal. GluN1 CTD-deletion eliminated UBP684, but not pregnenolone sulfate (PS), PAM activity. And, in the absence of agonists, UBP684, but not PS, was able to promote movement of fluorescently-tagged GluN1-CTDs. Thus, it may be possible to pharmacologically target NMDAR metabotropic activity in the absence of channel activation.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 153
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Role of the Helix-8 and C-Terminal Tail in Regulating Proteinase Activated Receptor 2 Signaling
    Thibeault, Pierre E.
    Ramachandran, Rithwik
    ACS PHARMACOLOGY & TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2020, 3 (05) : 868 - 882
  • [22] Identification of a crosstalk between ClC-1 C-terminal CBS domains and the transmembrane region
    Gaitan-Penas, Hector
    Perez-Gonzalez, Anna Priscilla
    Gonzalez-Subias, Marc
    Zdebik, Anselm A.
    Gasull, Xavier
    Buey, Ruben M.
    Errasti-Murugarren, Ekaitz
    Estevez, Raul
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2025, 603 (05): : 1123 - 1140
  • [23] Conformational rearrangement of the NMDA receptor amino-terminal domain during activation and allosteric modulation
    Vyklicky, Vojtech
    Stanley, Cherise
    Habrian, Chris
    Isacoff, Ehud Y.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [24] Visualizing pregnenolone sulfate-like modulators of NMDA receptor function reveals intracellular and plasma-membrane localization
    Chisari, Mariangela
    Wilding, Timothy J.
    Brunwasser, Samuel
    Krishnan, Kathiresan
    Qian, Mingxing
    Benz, Ann
    Huettner, James E.
    Zorumski, Charles F.
    Covey, Douglas F.
    Mennerick, Steven
    NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 144 : 91 - 103
  • [25] The activity of protein phosphatase 5 towards native clients is modulated by the middle- and C-terminal domains of Hsp90
    Haslbeck, Veronika
    Eckl, Julia M.
    Drazic, Adrian
    Rutz, Daniel A.
    Lorenz, Oliver R.
    Zimmermann, Kerstin
    Kriehuber, Thomas
    Lindemann, Claudia
    Madl, Tobias
    Richter, Klaus
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [26] C-terminal domain small phosphatase 1 and MAP kinase reciprocally control REST stability and neuronal differentiation
    Nesti, Edmund
    Corson, Glen M.
    McCleskey, Maxwell
    Oyer, Jon A.
    Mandel, Gail
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2014, 111 (37) : E3929 - E3936
  • [27] The variable C-terminal extension of G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 6 constitutes an accessorial autoregulatory domain
    Vatter, P
    Stoesser, C
    Samel, I
    Gierschik, P
    Moepps, B
    FEBS JOURNAL, 2005, 272 (23) : 6039 - 6051
  • [28] Differential regulation of STP, LTP and LTD by structurally diverse NMDA receptor subunit-specific positive allosteric modulators
    France, G.
    Volianskis, R.
    Ingram, R.
    Bannister, N.
    Rotharmel, R.
    Irvine, M. W.
    Fang, G.
    Burnell, E. S.
    Sapkota, K.
    Costa, B. M.
    Chopra, D. A.
    Dravid, S. M.
    Michael-Titus, A. T.
    Monaghan, D. T.
    Georgiou, J.
    Bortolotto, Z. A.
    Jane, D. E.
    Collingridge, G. L.
    Volianskis, A.
    NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 202
  • [29] Force and the α-C-terminal domains bias RNA polymerase recycling
    Qian, Jin
    Wang, Bing
    Artsimovitch, Irina
    Dunlap, David
    Finzi, Laura
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [30] Constitutive activity of a spermine receptor is maintained by a single site in the C-terminal
    Zhang, Zhe
    Gao, Xiang
    Zhang, Qinghua
    Li, Weming
    BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 526 (02) : 389 - 395