Heuristic cognitive diagnosis when the Q-matrix is unknown

被引:8
|
作者
Koehn, Hans-Friedrich [1 ]
Chiu, Chia-Yi [2 ]
Brusco, Michael J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Educ Psychol, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
[3] Florida State Univ, Coll Business, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
cognitive diagnosis; asymptotic theory of cognitive diagnosis; consistency; clustering; classification; heuristic; DINA MODEL; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1111/bmsp.12044
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Cognitive diagnosis models of educational test performance rely on a binary Q-matrix that specifies the associations between individual test items and the cognitive attributes (skills) required to answer those items correctly. Current methods for fitting cognitive diagnosis models to educational test data and assigning examinees to proficiency classes are based on parametric estimation methods such as expectation maximization (EM) and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) that frequently encounter difficulties in practical applications. In response to these difficulties, non-parametric classification techniques (cluster analysis) have been proposed as heuristic alternatives to parametric procedures. These non-parametric classification techniques first aggregate each examinee's test item scores into a profile of attribute sum scores, which then serve as the basis for clustering examinees into proficiency classes. Like the parametric procedures, the non-parametric classification techniques require that the Q-matrix underlying a given test be known. Unfortunately, in practice, the Q-matrix for most tests is not known and must be estimated to specify the associations between items and attributes, risking a misspecified Q-matrix that may then result in the incorrect classification of examinees. This paper demonstrates that clustering examinees into proficiency classes based on their item scores rather than on their attribute sum-score profiles does not require knowledge of the Q-matrix, and results in a more accurate classification of examinees.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 291
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Q-Matrix Refinement Based on Item Fit Statistic RMSEA
    Kang, Chunhua
    Yang, Yakun
    Zeng, Pingfei
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2019, 43 (07) : 527 - 542
  • [43] An Exploratory Discrete Factor Loading Method for Q-Matrix Specification in Cognitive Diagnostic Models
    Wang, Wenyi
    Song, Lihong
    Ding, Shuliang
    QUANTITATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 233 : 351 - 362
  • [44] Data-driven Q-matrix validation using a residual-based statistic in cognitive diagnostic assessment
    Yu, Xiaofeng
    Cheng, Ying
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 73 : 145 - 179
  • [45] A General Method of Empirical Q-matrix Validation
    Jimmy de la Torre
    Chia-Yi Chiu
    Psychometrika, 2016, 81 : 253 - 273
  • [46] A method of Q-matrix validation based on symmetrised Kullback-Leibler divergence for the DINA model
    Guo, Jinxin
    Xu, Xin
    Tao, Jian
    Shi, Ningzhong
    STATISTICS AND ITS INTERFACE, 2019, 12 (04) : 537 - 547
  • [47] A Nondiagnostic Assessment for Diagnostic Purposes: Q-Matrix Validation and Item-Based Model Fit Evaluation for the TIMSS 2011 Assessment
    Terzi, Ragip
    Sen, Sedat
    SAGE OPEN, 2019, 9 (01):
  • [48] A new Q-matrix validation method based on signal detection theory
    Li, Jia
    Chen, Ping
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024,
  • [49] Tracking knowledge proficiency of students with calibrated Q-matrix
    Wang, Wentao
    Ma, Huifang
    Zhao, Yan
    Li, Zhixin
    He, Xiangchun
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 192
  • [50] The Impact of Q-Matrix Designs on Diagnostic Classification Accuracy in the Presence of Attribute Hierarchies
    Liu, Ren
    Huggins-Manley, Anne Corinne
    Bradshaw, Laine
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2017, 77 (02) : 220 - 240