Heuristic cognitive diagnosis when the Q-matrix is unknown

被引:8
|
作者
Koehn, Hans-Friedrich [1 ]
Chiu, Chia-Yi [2 ]
Brusco, Michael J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Educ Psychol, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
[3] Florida State Univ, Coll Business, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
cognitive diagnosis; asymptotic theory of cognitive diagnosis; consistency; clustering; classification; heuristic; DINA MODEL; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1111/bmsp.12044
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Cognitive diagnosis models of educational test performance rely on a binary Q-matrix that specifies the associations between individual test items and the cognitive attributes (skills) required to answer those items correctly. Current methods for fitting cognitive diagnosis models to educational test data and assigning examinees to proficiency classes are based on parametric estimation methods such as expectation maximization (EM) and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) that frequently encounter difficulties in practical applications. In response to these difficulties, non-parametric classification techniques (cluster analysis) have been proposed as heuristic alternatives to parametric procedures. These non-parametric classification techniques first aggregate each examinee's test item scores into a profile of attribute sum scores, which then serve as the basis for clustering examinees into proficiency classes. Like the parametric procedures, the non-parametric classification techniques require that the Q-matrix underlying a given test be known. Unfortunately, in practice, the Q-matrix for most tests is not known and must be estimated to specify the associations between items and attributes, risking a misspecified Q-matrix that may then result in the incorrect classification of examinees. This paper demonstrates that clustering examinees into proficiency classes based on their item scores rather than on their attribute sum-score profiles does not require knowledge of the Q-matrix, and results in a more accurate classification of examinees.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 291
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Priority attribute algorithm for Q-matrix validation: A didactic
    Qin, Haijiang
    Guo, Lei
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2024, 57 (01)
  • [32] An EM-Based Method for Q-Matrix Validation
    Wang, Wenyi
    Song, Lihong
    Ding, Shuliang
    Meng, Yaru
    Cao, Canxi
    Jie, Yongjing
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2018, 42 (06) : 446 - 459
  • [33] On the Consistency of Q-Matrix Estimation: A Commentary
    Liu, Jingchen
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2017, 82 (02) : 523 - 527
  • [34] On the Consistency of Q-Matrix Estimation: A Commentary
    Jingchen Liu
    Psychometrika, 2017, 82 : 523 - 527
  • [35] Theorems and Methods of a Complete Q Matrix With Attribute Hierarchies Under Restricted Q-Matrix Design
    Cai, Yan
    Tu, Dongbo
    Ding, Shuliang
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [36] On the Consistency of Q-Matrix Estimation: A Rejoinder
    de la Torre, Jimmy
    Chiu, Chia-Yi
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2017, 82 (02) : 528 - 529
  • [37] On the Consistency of Q-Matrix Estimation: A Rejoinder
    Jimmy de la Torre
    Chia-Yi Chiu
    Psychometrika, 2017, 82 : 528 - 529
  • [38] A Gibbs sampling algorithm that estimates the Q-matrix for the DINA model
    Chung, Mengta
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 93
  • [39] Cognitive Diagnosis Method via Q-Matrix-Embedded Neural Networks
    Tao, Jinhong
    Zhao, Wei
    Liu, Fengjuan
    Guo, Xiaoqing
    Cheng, Nuo
    Guo, Qian
    Xu, Xiaoqing
    Duan, Hong
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (22):
  • [40] How to Build a Complete Q-Matrix for a Cognitively Diagnostic Test
    Kohn, Hans-Friedrich
    Chiu, Chia-Yi
    JOURNAL OF CLASSIFICATION, 2018, 35 (02) : 273 - 299