Our experience on management of failed pediatric pyeloplasty

被引:9
|
作者
Ceyhan, Erman [1 ,3 ]
Dogan, Hasan Serkan [2 ]
Tekgul, Serdar [2 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Urol, Fac Med, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Hacettepe Univ, Div Pediat Urol, Dept Urol, Fac Med, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Baskent Univ, Dept Urol, Konya Hosp, Konya, Turkey
关键词
Hydronephrosis; Recurrence; Dilatation; Follow-up studies; Child; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION; BALLOON DILATATION; ENDOPYELOTOMY; CHILDREN; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1007/s00383-020-04699-9
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of the study was to assess the outcomes of salvage procedures after failed pediatric pyeloplasty. Recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction treatment is a difficult course. The salvage surgery is more challenging in the pediatric population. We aimed to assess the outcomes of salvage procedures after failed pediatric pyeloplasty to determine the most efficient surgical intervention. Methods 40 children with 41 renal units who have been treated for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after pyeloplasty were analyzed retrospectively. The outcomes of all initial and sequent interventions were assessed including redo pyeloplasty, endopyelotomy and balloon dilatation. Results Children's mean age at initial intervention for failed pyeloplasty was 45.9 (+/- 46.4) months. Our mean follow-up time after the initial intervention was 46.9 (+/- 46.6) months. The success rate of our initial treatment methods was 48.7% (20/41). Although redo pyeloplasty was the most successful intervention (83.3%) than DJS placement (45.5%), endopyelotomy (50%) and balloon dilatation (30.8%), the statistical difference was not significant in the initial operations. The overall success rates of redo pyeloplasty, double-J stent placement, endopyelotomy and balloon dilatation were 78.9%, 46.1%, 38.8% and 29.4%, respectively (p < 0.05). Conclusions Redo pyeloplasty provides the best improvement in recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. In selected patients, minimal invasive methods such as endopyelotomy and balloon dilatation offer alternative treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:971 / 976
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Our experience on management of failed pediatric pyeloplasty
    Erman Ceyhan
    Hasan Serkan Dogan
    Serdar Tekgul
    Pediatric Surgery International, 2020, 36 : 971 - 976
  • [2] Balloon dilation for failed pyeloplasty in children?
    Duan, Haifeng
    Zhu, Wei
    Zhong, Wen
    Li, Xiaohang
    Zeng, Guohua
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2019, 45 (03): : 617 - 620
  • [3] Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients. Our initial cases and lessons learned
    Garcia-Aparicio, L.
    Tarrado, X.
    Rodo, J.
    Krauel, L.
    Olivares, M.
    Rovira, J.
    Ribo, J. M.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2010, 34 (05): : 473 - 476
  • [4] Endopyelotomy versus redo pyeoloplasty for management of failed pyeloplasty in children: A single center experience
    Abdrabuh, Abdrabuh M.
    Salih, Elsayed M.
    Aboelnasr, Mahmoud
    Galal, Hussein
    El-Emam, Abdelbasset
    El-Zayat, Tarek
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2018, 53 (11) : 2250 - 2255
  • [5] National Trends in Secondary Procedures Following Pediatric Pyeloplasty
    Dy, Geolani W.
    Hsi, Ryan S.
    Holt, Sarah K.
    Lendvay, Thomas S.
    Gore, John L.
    Harper, Jonathan D.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04) : 1209 - 1214
  • [6] Failed Pyeloplasty in Children: Revisiting the Unknown
    Romao, Rodrigo L. P.
    Koyle, Martin A.
    Salle, Joao L. Pippi
    Alotay, Abdulhakim
    Figueroa, Victor H.
    Lorenzo, Armando J.
    Bagli, Darius J.
    Farhat, Walid A.
    UROLOGY, 2013, 82 (05) : 1145 - 1148
  • [7] MANAGEMENT OF PEDIATRIC CHOLELITIASIS: OUR EXPERIENCE
    Cofini, M.
    Favoriti, P.
    Pietrantoni, S.
    Quadrozzi, F.
    MINERVA PEDIATRICA, 2014, 66 (04) : 267 - 273
  • [8] Optimal Length of Follow-up for the Detection of Unsuccessful Pediatric Pyeloplasty: A Single-Center Experience
    Bansal, Utsav K.
    Dangle, Pankaj P.
    Stephany, Heidi
    Durrani, Asad
    Cannon, Glenn
    Schneck, Francis X.
    Ost, Michael C.
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2017, 5
  • [9] Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants: Single-surgeon experience
    Chandrasekharam, V. V. S.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2015, 11 (05) : 272.e1 - 272.e5
  • [10] Retroperitoneal versus Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Our Experience
    Qadri, Syed Javid Farooq
    Khan, Muneer
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2010, 85 (03) : 309 - 313