Application of Dual-Energy Spectral Computed Tomography in Bone Mineral Density Measurement: Phantom and Clinical Research

被引:6
作者
Wang, Mingyue [1 ]
Wu, Yan [1 ]
Zhou, Yue [1 ]
Dong, Junqiang [1 ]
Hu, Shenshen [1 ]
Hou, Ping [1 ]
Gao, Jianbo [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiol, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE | 2022年 / 15卷
关键词
dual-energy spectral computed tomography; quantitative computed tomography; bone mineral density; European spine phantom; spine; MATERIAL DECOMPOSITION; TRABECULAR BONE; CT; OSTEOPOROSIS; RECONSTRUCTION; ACCURACY; SPINE; FAT;
D O I
10.2147/IJGM.S381857
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Early detection and treatment of osteoporosis through bone mineral density (BMD) measurement could aid in the prevention of osteoporosis-related fractures. We aimed to assess the parameter of dual-energy spectral CT (DesCT) consistency with BMD determination using quantitative computed tomography (QCT), thereby establishing a basis for further DesCT application for BMD determination. Methods: We subjected the European spine phantom, which contains three vertebral bodies (V1, V2, and V3), to DesCT with different radiation doses. The basis material pairs were hydroxyapatite (water), calcium (water), and hydroxyapatite (fat). Additionally, the medical records of 152 patients who underwent QCT and DesCT for chest scans in a two-month period were reviewed to measure BMD values. Results: No significant differences were found in the basis pair values of the V1, V2, or V3 vertebrae under different radiation doses in the phantom; in particular, the hydroxyapatite (water), hydroxyapatite (fat), relative error values of V1, V2, and V3 under different radiation doses were not significantly different (all p > 0.05). For patients, the hydroxyapatite (water), hydroxyapatite (fat), and hydroxyapatite (average) values measured by DesCT had a significant correlation with BMD measured by QCT Among 242 vertebrae (152 T12 and 90 L1 vertebrae), there was no significant difference between the BMD measured by QCT and the HAP (average) measured by DesCT (p = 0.071). The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value was 0.925 between the HAP (average) and HAP (average) with DesCT and BMD measured by QCT (p < 0.001). Bland-Altman diagram indicated that both measurements were in good agreement. Discussion: We showed that BMD values measured by DesCT were stable and repeatable under different radiation doses. DesCT and QCT measurements of human BMD were highly correlated. Thus, DesCT-based BMD assessment of the spine in a clinical setting could be considered feasible.
引用
收藏
页码:6887 / 6896
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan Versus Computed Tomography for Bone Density Assessment
    Alawi, Malak
    Begum, Azra
    Harraz, Mohammed
    Alawi, Hani
    Bamagos, Shahd
    Yaghmour, Abdulmalek
    Hafiz, Lubna
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (02)
  • [2] Simultaneous characterization of electron density and effective atomic number for radiotherapy planning using stoichiometric calibration method and dual energy algorithms
    Birgani, Mohammad J. Tahmasebi
    Mahdavi, Maziyar
    Zabihzadeh, Mansour
    Lotfi, Mehrzad
    Mosleh-Shirazi, Mohammad A.
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2018, 41 (03) : 601 - 619
  • [3] Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative dual-energy CT-based bone mineral density assessment in comparison to Hounsfield unit measurements using dual x-ray absorptiometry as standard of reference
    Booz, Christian
    Noeske, Jochen
    Albrecht, Moritz H.
    Lenga, Lukas
    Martin, Simon S.
    Yel, Ibrahim
    Huizinga, Nicole A.
    Vogl, Thomas J.
    Wichmann, Julian L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 132
  • [4] A common LRP4 haplotype is associated with bone mineral density and hip geometry in men Data from the Odense Androgen Study (OAS)
    Boudin, Eveline
    Steenackers, Ellen
    de Freitas, Fenna
    Nielsen, Torben Leo
    Andersen, Marianne
    Brixen, Kim
    Van Hul, Wim
    Piters, Elke
    [J]. BONE, 2013, 53 (02) : 414 - 420
  • [5] Gender interactions between vertebral bone mineral density and fat content in the elderly: Assessment using fat-water MRI
    Chen, Chiao-Chi
    Liu, Yi-Jui
    Lee, Shiou-Ping
    Yang, Hou-Ting
    Chan, Wing P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 51 (05) : 1382 - 1389
  • [6] Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis
    Cosman, F.
    de Beur, S. J.
    LeBoff, M. S.
    Lewiecki, E. M.
    Tanner, B.
    Randall, S.
    Lindsay, R.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 25 (10) : 2359 - 2381
  • [7] Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures
    Cummings, SR
    Melton, LJ
    [J]. LANCET, 2002, 359 (9319) : 1761 - 1767
  • [8] Clinical Use of Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Advanced Techniques in the Management of Osteoporosis in Adults: the 2015 ISCD Official Positions-Part III
    Engelke, Klaus
    Lang, Thomas
    Khosla, Sundeep
    Qin, Ling
    Zysset, Philippe
    Leslie, William D.
    Shepherd, John A.
    Shousboe, John T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2015, 18 (03) : 393 - 407
  • [9] Fehrmann Ana, 2020, Radiol Case Rep, V15, P900, DOI 10.1016/j.radcr.2020.04.006
  • [10] Variation in Attenuation in L1 Trabecular Bone at Different Tube Voltages: Caution Is Warranted When Screening for Osteoporosis With the Use of Opportunistic CT
    Garner, Hillary W.
    Paturzo, Michelle M.
    Gaudier, Gabriela
    Pickhardt, Perry J.
    Wessell, Daniel E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 208 (01) : 165 - 170