Evaluation of short-term precision for tibial ultrasonometry

被引:19
作者
Lequin, MH
van Rijn, RR
Robben, SGF
Hop, WCJ
Dijkhuis, S
Fijten, MMEG
Meijer, LAW
van Kuijk, C
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Expt Radiol, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Childrens Hosp Sophia, Dept Pediat Radiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Haarlem, Netherlands
[4] Med Imaging & Radiotherapeut Tech, Sch Higher Vocat Educ, Haarlem, Netherlands
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Osteoporosis & Arthrit Res Grp, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
pediatric; quantitative ultrasonometry; tibia; precision;
D O I
10.1007/s002239900573
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Tibial quantitative ultrasonometry is a relatively novel technique in the field of bone sonometry, an emerging alternative to bone densitometry. The implementation of this technique in a pediatric population could prove valuable from a clinical as well as a research viewpoint. In clinical practice it is necessary to know the precision of this technique and the possible influence on measurements before implementation. This study presents the precision in a Caucasian pediatric population and the influence of measurement site, dexterity, brand of coupling gel, and temperature of coupling gel. To assess intra- and interobserver variance duplicate measurements, with repositioning, ultrasonometry was performed in 10 children over a short period of time. The observers were blinded for the results of the other observer and after each measurement the skin markings were removed. Intraobserver variance for operator one (MHL) and for observer two (SFGR) was CV 0.43%. The interobserver variance was CV 0.61%. Left midtibial and right midtibial speed of sound (SOS) measurements showed no significant differences. There were, however, significant differences in both boys and girls between right proximal versus right midtibial, right midtibial versus right distal, and right proximal versus right distal (for all P < 0.001). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that neither the use of different coupling gels nor an increase in gel temperature had a significant influence on measurements. The results of our study show that tibial quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) is a highly reproducible technique in a Caucasian pediatric population.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 27
页数:4
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, OSTEOPOROSIS
[2]  
ARNAUDO JS, 1992, DRAFT GUIDANCE REV B, P24
[3]   MEASUREMENT OF HANDEDNESS VIA SELF-REPORT - THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BRIEF AND EXTENDED INVENTORIES [J].
COREN, S .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1993, 76 (03) :1035-1042
[4]   BONE-DENSITY AT VARIOUS SITES FOR PREDICTION OF HIP-FRACTURES [J].
CUMMINGS, SR ;
BLACK, DM ;
NEVITT, MC ;
BROWNER, W ;
CAULEY, J ;
ENSRUD, K ;
GENANT, HK ;
PALERMO, L ;
SCOTT, J ;
VOGT, TM .
LANCET, 1993, 341 (8837) :72-75
[5]   Ultrasound velocity and attenuation at different skeletal sites compared with bone mineral density measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry [J].
Cunningham, JL ;
Fordham, JN ;
Hewitt, TA ;
Speed, CA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1996, 69 (817) :25-32
[6]  
DIDIA BC, 1988, FOOT ANKLE, V8, P192
[7]   COMPARISON OF BONE-MINERAL CONTENT AND BONE-MINERAL DENSITY BETWEEN DOMINANT AND NONDOMINANT LIMBS IN CHILDREN 8-16 YEARS OF AGE [J].
FAULKNER, RA ;
HOUSTON, CS ;
BAILEY, DA ;
DRINKWATER, DT ;
MCKAY, HA ;
WILKINSON, AA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN BIOLOGY, 1993, 5 (04) :491-499
[8]   QUANTITATIVE ULTRASOUND OF THE TIBIA - A NOVEL-APPROACH FOR ASSESSMENT OF BONE STATUS [J].
FOLDES, AJ ;
RIMON, A ;
KEINAN, DD ;
POPOVTZER, MM .
BONE, 1995, 17 (04) :363-367
[9]  
Funck C, 1996, CALCIFIED TISSUE INT, V58, P390, DOI 10.1007/s002239900063
[10]   PEAK TRABECULAR VERTEBRAL DENSITY - A COMPARISON OF ADOLESCENT AND ADULT FEMALES [J].
GILSANZ, V ;
GIBBENS, DT ;
CARLSON, M ;
BOECHAT, MI ;
CANN, CE ;
SCHULZ, EE .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1988, 43 (04) :260-262