Affective Processes in Human-Automation Interactions

被引:127
|
作者
Merritt, Stephanie M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Psychol, St Louis, MO 63141 USA
关键词
trust; reliance; emotions; HUMAN INTERVENTION; MOOD MANIPULATION; DECISION-MAKING; SELF-CONFIDENCE; TRUST; SYSTEMS; INFORMATION; TECHNOLOGY; MODEL; TASK;
D O I
10.1177/0018720811411912
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objective: This study contributes to the literature on automation reliance by illuminating the influences of user moods and emotions on reliance on automated systems. Background: Past work has focused predominantly on cognitive and attitudinal variables, such as perceived machine reliability and trust. However, recent work on human decision making suggests that affective variables (i.e., moods and emotions) are also important. Drawing from the affect infusion model, significant effects of affect are hypothesized. Furthermore, a new affectively laden attitude termed liking is introduced. Method: Participants watched video clips selected to induce positive or negative moods, then interacted with a fictitious automated system on an X-ray screening task. At five time points, important variables were assessed including trust, liking, perceived machine accuracy, user self-perceived accuracy, and reliance. These variables, along with propensity to trust machines and state affect, were integrated in a structural equation model. Results: Happiness significantly increased trust and liking for the system throughout the task. Liking was the only variable that significantly predicted reliance early in the task. Trust predicted reliance later in the task, whereas perceived machine accuracy and user self-perceived accuracy had no significant direct effects on reliance at any time. Conclusion: Affective influences on automation reliance are demonstrated, suggesting that this decision-making process may be less rational and more emotional than previously acknowledged. Application: Liking for a new system may be key to appropriate reliance, particularly early in the task. Positive affect can be easily induced and may be a lever for increasing liking.
引用
收藏
页码:356 / 370
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Visualization of Complex Situations to Strengthen Human-Automation Collaboration
    Zohrevandi, Elmira
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 31ST EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS: DESIGN FOR COGNITION (ECCE 2019), 2019, : 14 - 18
  • [42] Canonical correlation analysis of data on human-automation interaction
    Shafto, MG
    Degani, A
    Kirlik, A
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY 41ST ANNUAL MEETING, 1997, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, : 62 - 65
  • [43] Human-Automation Teaming: Lessons Learned and Future Directions
    Battiste, Vernol
    Lachter, Joel
    Brandt, Summer
    Alvarez, Armando
    Strybel, Thomas Z.
    Vu, Kim-Phuong L.
    HUMAN INTERFACE AND THE MANAGEMENT OF INFORMATION: INFORMATION IN APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES, HIMI 2018 HELD AS PART OF HCII 2018, PART II, 2018, 10905 : 479 - 493
  • [44] Automation, Task, and Context Features: Impacts on Pilots' Judgments of Human-Automation Interaction
    Mosier, Kathleen L.
    Fischer, Ute
    Morrow, Daniel
    Feigh, Karen M.
    Durso, Francis T.
    Sullivan, Katlyn
    Pop, Vlad
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2013, 7 (04) : 377 - 399
  • [45] Literature Review on Human-Automation Interaction: Relationship Between Healthcare Automation and Human Error at Work
    Cho, Min Ho
    Seo, Yejin
    Duffy, Vincent G.
    DIGITAL HUMAN MODELING AND APPLICATIONS IN HEALTH, SAFETY, ERGONOMICS AND RISK MANAGEMENT, PT II, DHM 2024, 2024, 14710 : 16 - 34
  • [46] The Human Nervous System as a Model for Function Allocation in Human-Automation Interaction
    Durgun, Behice
    ADVANCES IN NEUROERGONOMICS AND COGNITIVE ENGINEERING (AHFE 2017), 2018, 586 : 401 - 409
  • [47] Reflections on Commentaries on "Issues in Human-Automation Interaction Modeling"
    Kaber, David B.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2018, 12 (01) : 86 - 93
  • [48] Modeling Human-Automation Task Allocations in Lunar Landing
    Wen, Hui Ying
    Duda, Kevin R.
    Slesnick, Catherine L.
    Oman, Charles M.
    2011 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, 2011,
  • [49] Science of agency and automation design: Towards a model for effective human-automation interaction
    Berberian, Bruno
    Le Goff, Kevin
    Rey, Arnaud
    Haggard, Patrick
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 1146 - 1146
  • [50] The Human-Automation Behavioral Interaction Task (HABIT) analysis framework
    Baird, Isabelle
    Fendley, Mary E.
    Warren, Rik
    HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS IN MANUFACTURING & SERVICE INDUSTRIES, 2022, 32 (06) : 452 - 461