Between Rights in the City and the Right to the City: Heritage, Character and Public Participation in Urban Planning

被引：0

作者：

Thorpe, Amelia ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] UNSW Sydney, Fac Law, Sydney, NSW, Australia

来源：

HERITAGE, CULTURE AND RIGHTS: CHALLENGING LEGAL DISCOURSES | 2017年

关键词：

NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER; PLACE-IDENTITY; LAND-USE; PROPERTY; NIMBY; DISCOURSES; OBJECTION; POLITICS; SYDNEY; REFORM;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

C [社会科学总论];

学科分类号：

03 ; 0303 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：121 / 147

页数：27

共 121 条

[1] [Anonymous], THEORIES URBAN POLIT
[2] [Anonymous], LOCAL GOVT LAW J
[3] [Anonymous], 2006, AIAL FORUM
[4] LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
ARNSTEIN, SR
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04): : 216 - 224
[5] Atkinson R.G., 2008, PUBLIC HOUSING AUSTR
[6] What kind of right is the right to the city?
Attoh, Kafui A.
[J]. PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 35 (05) : 669 - 685
[7] WHAT FUTURE FOR ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RIGHTS
BEETHAM, D
[J]. POLITICAL STUDIES, 1995, 43 : 41 - 60
[8] Begg Zanny., 2011, The Right to the City
[9] Performing Property: Making The World
Blomley, Nicholas
[J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE, 2013, 26 (01) : 23 - 48
[10] Blomley Nicholas., 2004, Unsettling the City: Urban Land and the Politics of Property