Differences for bound water content as estimated by pressure-volume and adsorption isotherm curves

被引:11
作者
Rascio, A [1 ]
Nicastro, G [1 ]
Carlino, E [1 ]
Di Fonzo, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Ist Sperimentale Cerealicoltura, I-71100 Foggia, Italy
关键词
durum wheat; drought adaptation; osmotic potential; bound water properties; free water; water status;
D O I
10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.03.026
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Pressure-volume (PV) and adsorption isotherm (AI) curves were constructed on fresh and dry tissues of durum wheat respectively, to assess the relation between the water status of living leaves and the properties of water that is bound (BW) with different strength to ionic, polar or hydrophobic sites of macromolecules. The leaves were collected from six genotypes grown in field, in 2 years. The amounts of the non-osmotic BW fraction, free water and osmotic potential at full turgor were determined by pressure-volume (PV) curves. Three parameters that relate to the amounts of the weakly and strongly bound water (quantitative BW properties) and five parameters related to tissues-binding strength for the same water fractions (qualitative BW properties) were calculated by AI-curves. The non-osmotic volume of PV-curves doesn't correspond to the water fraction bound to the charged or polar sites of macromolecules as determined by AI-curves. The qualitative parameters, in contrast to quantitative parameters, may be affected by common physical-chemical factors: the changes in the amount of strongly bound water in tissues were independent from those in the weakly bound fraction; in contrast an increase in tissue affinity for strongly bound water implied a simultaneous increase in the affinity for weakly bound water. The qualitative properties of bound water may be particularly important for drought adaptation in durum wheat, being associated with the solute potential and with the succulence degree of the leaves. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 401
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Plant responses to water deficit [J].
Bray, EA .
TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 1997, 2 (02) :48-54
[2]  
CAMERON IL, 1988, SCANNING MICROSCOPY, V2, P275
[3]   COMPARISON OF OSMOTIC POTENTIAL, ELASTIC-MODULUS, AND APOPLASTIC WATER IN LEAVES OF DRYLAND WINTER-WHEAT [J].
CAMPBELL, GS ;
PAPENDICK, RI ;
RABIE, E ;
SHAYONGOWI, AJ .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1979, 71 (01) :31-36
[4]  
Cedola M. C., 1994, Journal of Genetics and Breeding, V48, P229
[5]  
Clegg J.S., 1991, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Fishes, V1, P1
[7]   INTRACELLULAR WATER AND THE CYTOMATRIX - SOME METHODS OF STUDY AND CURRENT VIEWS [J].
CLEGG, JS .
JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1984, 99 (01) :S167-S171
[8]   DROUGHT RESISTANCE IN SPRING WHEAT CULTIVARS .1. GRAIN-YIELD RESPONSES [J].
FISCHER, RA ;
MAURER, R .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1978, 29 (05) :897-912
[9]   PHOTOCHEMICAL QUENCHING OF CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE IN DIFFERENT DURUM-WHEAT (TRITICUM-DURUM) CULTIVARS [J].
FLAGELLA, Z ;
PASTORE, D ;
CAMPANILE, RG ;
DIFONZO, N .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1994, 122 :183-192
[10]   QUANTITY OF WATER IN CELL WALL AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE [J].
GAFF, DF ;
CARR, DJ .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1961, 14 (03) :299-&