An investigation into the factors affecting knowledge management adoption and practice in the life insurance business

被引:38
作者
Huang, Li-Su [1 ]
Quaddus, Mohammed
Rowe, Anna L. [2 ]
Lai, Cheng-Po [3 ]
机构
[1] Mingdao Univ, Dept Finance, Peetow 52345, Changhua, Taiwan
[2] Curtin Univ, Grad Sch Business, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Nanhua Univ, Inst Financial Management, Chiayi, Taiwan
关键词
knowledge management (KM); competitive advantage; innovation; KM practice; life insurance; multiple-case study; USER ACCEPTANCE; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; DIFFUSION; SYSTEMS; INNOVATIONS; FRAMEWORK; MODEL;
D O I
10.1057/kmrp.2011.2
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Knowledge management (KM) is crucial for organizations to enhance competitive advantage. While the issues of KM have been widely discussed by numerous researchers, there is a paucity of studies pertaining to KM adoption and practice for the life insurance industry. Therefore, this paper aims to investigate the main factors affecting the life insurance business in adopting and applying KM. An exploratory field study utilizing an inductive methodology involving a multiple-case study approach was undertaken by conducting interviews with 10 key knowledge workers from life insurance enterprises in various stages of KM development and use. We utilized content analysis techniques to identify the factors with their associated variables and further developed a research model. This study offers a comprehensive model for future KM research and provides managerial implications for organizations, particularly life insurance enterprises, to better realize the worth of KM and the possible impediments involved in the processes of adopting and implementing KM. Knowledge Management Research & Practice (2011) 9, 58-72. doi:10.1057/kmrp.2011.2
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 72
页数:15
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   A field study of the adoption of software process innovations by information systems professionals [J].
Agarwal, R ;
Prasad, J .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2000, 47 (03) :295-308
[2]  
Ajzen I., 1980, UNDERSTANDING ATTITU, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-32]
[3]   Review:: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems:: Conceptual foundations and research issues [J].
Alavi, M ;
Leidner, DE .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2001, 25 (01) :107-136
[4]  
Alavi M., 1999, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, V1, DOI [10.17705/1CAIS.00107, DOI 10.17705/1CAIS.00107, 10.17705/1cais.00107]
[5]  
*AM PROD QUAL CTR, 2007, EX SUMM KNOWL MAN BE
[6]  
AMIDON DM, 2003, HDB KNOWLEDGE MANAGE, V2, P331
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, DOI DOI 10.1002/NUR.4770140111
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2003, THESIS CURTIN U TECH
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Journal of Knowledge Management, DOI [10.1108/13673270110384365, DOI 10.1108/13673270110384365]
[10]  
Baptista R., 1999, INT J ECON BUS, V6, P107, DOI [10.1080/13571519984359, DOI 10.1080/13571519984359]